Talk:Lucidworks

Contributions to Solr

The current article text claims that Lucidworks employs one third of Apache Solr's committers and contributes 70% of the code. It's great that Lucidworks is a major supporter of the open source Solr project, and they should definitely get some recognition and credit here. However, those very concrete claims need sourcing. Or perhaps the claims should be slightly toned down to something that can be sourced somehow.

Besides that, some explanation would be helpful. Is this referring just to the API wrapper around the Apache Lucene search engine, which is what Solr has become nowadays? If so, that's still great, but it's not nearly as impressive, and should be made clear. And if it's also referring to contributions to the underlying Lucene search engine, I have a hard time believing those percentages, given the massive contributions that the Elasticsearch project has been making to Lucene during the past few years.StormWillLaugh (talk) 08:31, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Request edit on 12 September 2021

• As of Sept 7th, 2021, Lucidworks has a new logo:
• Wikipedia entries should have updated logos.:
• Compare the current site to an archive (old logo in right-side hero/header graphic). The logo has changed.:

Ao4047 (talk) 15:55, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

• Done. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Further cleanup needed

While the recent cleanup appears very helpful despite being one huge edit that's difficult to parse, many of the references are poor and/or promotional. Further cleanup is needed so the article is written from clearly reliable, independent sources. --Hipal (talk) 16:42, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Architecture-Design-628x420.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)