Talk:Lineated barbet

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birds Mid‑importance

Lineated barbet is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Edits Removed

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello! I see that my edits were removed for this article as both possible vandalism and good faith edits. As a new editor, any feedback or explanation would be helpful to me. Is this the right place for this info? I have reverted the edits and am open to feedback to improve my contribution!

Thank you! DonGaucho (talk) 19:06, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

You should have read my edit summary of the removal : Rem test edits with partly copy-vio texts. See WP:COPYVIO. Apart from that, you did not even bother to write full sentences, that's why I call them "test edits". BhagyaMani (talk) 03:21, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@BhagyaMani Thank you for the additional explanation! I saw your summary, but didn't understand the abbreviations as I'm still learning. Also appreciate the note about use of full sentences - I was imitating source material which I now understand is not appropriate. Much appreciated! DonGaucho (talk) 03:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

you are welcome. BhagyaMani (talk) 09:20, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply