Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:Larry Appelbaum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by WikipediholicRat in topic Did you know nomination
Good articleLarry Appelbaum has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 1, 2025Articles for deletionKept
July 5, 2026Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Larry Appelbaum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: WikipediholicRat (talk · contribs) 19:04, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Dragonhawk12 (talk · contribs) 16:31, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear, concise and understandable to an appropriately broad audience, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    "Appelbaum also found recordings of Duke Ellington playing with Django Reinhardt in 1946." - The wording makes it unclear whether Appelbaum found the recordings in 1946 or they recorded it in 1946.
    "He played with Kenny Dennis (a drummer) and Wendell Marshall (a bassist)." - You don't need parenthesis. You could say something like "He played with drummer Kenny Dennis and bassist Wendell Marshall". All fixed
    Other than that, everything is fine. I was bold and fixed minor things myself.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    Refs are laid out correctly.
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    Spot check here. There are some issues that need addressing. You can either reply on that page or here. Fixed
    C. It contains no original research:
    The claim "Appelbaum got his first job at the Library of Congress while still in college in 1979." is unsourced. All fixed
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
    Earwig's highest percent was around 24%, but that's due to quotations. No copyright violations here.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    The article should talk about his role as an archivist other than "Besides being and archivist...". You should include what he did as an archivist at the library Fixed (This source should help.)
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
    Shouldn't his work as a DJ for WMUC-FM, WDCU, and WPFW be in the "career and discoveries" section? I would say merge the sections together and name the entire thing "Biography", using sub-headings separating his early life and career. I would also say make "discoveries" it's own section. Fixed
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
    article is netural; it doesn't lean towards one viewpoint or another.
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
    No edit wars present.
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    All images are tagged with their copyright status. They are all from the US government, making them in the public domain. All images have suitable captions.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    There are some things that need addressing. Please fix these things. My biggest concern is that the "Career and discoveries" section feels jumbled, with points about his discoveries and career being scattered about. His career and discoveries should be split into two sections. If there is no response within 2 weeks, I will fail the article. Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 17:38, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Everything is fixed. There were some issues I didn't mention here, but rather in the unofficial discord. I was talking with the nominator through the discord (it made it easier). Issues address there were the lead and sourcing issues after the fact. Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 19:40, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I am reviewing this article for a QPQ with the nominator. If you have any questions or I screw anything up, please tell me! Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 16:31, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]

  • Source: Fisher, Marc (February 26, 2025). "Larry Appelbaum, jazz explorer and DJ, dies at 67". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 7, 2026.
    • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by WikipediholicRat (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

WikipediholicRat (talk) 21:20, 5 July 2026 (UTC).Reply