Talk:Landmark Legal Foundation

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help!
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites.

Upload

Not notable

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The reference is to it's own website. Not notable. Betaeleven 19:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

i have about seven tabs open of notable information from reputable sites, and am compiling them in a concise and clear manner. [Anon]

Thanks! Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 18:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Gone

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Looks like this organization has gone out of business. 99.36.20.167 (talk) 11:21, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The page lack reliable sources. I removed the funding section because, in addition to using non-RS, it appeared to be undue. Better sources are needed overall on this page however. More to come. DaltonCastle (talk) 06:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Reply