Edge Rewrite
Jump to content

Talk:K-pop

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Travelmite in topic Business information outdated

Addition of images on infobox

[edit]

I would like to know why to place images of artists in the infobox about music genre? Who chose which artists would be notable here? There aren't Big Bang, BoA, and others. In addition, what is the point of this type of edition that doesn't bring improvements to the article? In pop music article, we haven't images of Michael Jackson and Madonna on infobox, in rock music article we haven't images of Elvis and Beatles. This is because the articles already mention the notable artists.

Please consider removing this.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 191.19.164.94 (talk) 191.19.164.94 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - RPM SP 2022 - MASY1-GC 1260 200 Thu

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 February 2022 and 5 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yh3907 (article contribs).

Wiki Education assignment: First-Year Seminar - Shaping of the Modern World

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2025 and 22 December 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lena2405 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: JCN history.

— Assignment last updated by DocBui (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

"reliance on English phrases"

[edit]

This terminology ultimately has a patronizing "us-vs-them" tone, as if the artists are desperately using English to drive sales, rather than remixing black, Caribbean, trap, Japanese, Korean, Thai, Western, country, EDM, etc influences all at once. The Kpop artists use English phrases to create a trans-pacific slur, similar to as pioneered by Love Psychedelico, it isn't a desperate crutch they're using to earn cash. It's an art, not a computer generated algorithm. -~2026-24852-53 (talk) 21:25, 10 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

also note that WP privileges this total twat-comment "your music is global just as ours" just because it's British foreign secretary. i'd like to play him an afro-carribean jam created by an eton grad of Bengali origin and ask him how much is his music, their music, our music, your music etc. such a pathetic addition to this entry. -~2026-24852-53 (talk) 18:02, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Business information outdated

[edit]

The business information is outdated and excessive. The graph showing 2008 to 2020 only shows three companies, not Hybe. Travelmite (talk) 04:38, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Here is a table, which has been consolidated:

Total revenues of K-pop record labels (in USD million)
Year of
establishment
Record label 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Source
1995 SM Entertainment 42.5 87.1 129 241 268 286.9 290 314 329 551 592 521 [1]
1996 YG Entertainment 16.5 51.8 70.3 96.9 116.6 156.3 170 286.4 321.5 242 228 229 [2]
1997 JYP Entertainment 3.1 9.1 17.8 13.5 21.4 48.5 50.56 69.5 94 111 139 129 [3]

I've truncated the table to show figures for once every four years. The sources for this data go far beyond the 2013 date in the archive, which no longer can be found. There is inconsistency in the reporting, the table should not be regarded as reliable. Travelmite (talk) 06:01, 24 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

  1. "S.M. Entertainment (041510:KOSDAQ): Financial Statements". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on March 2, 2010. Retrieved March 29, 2013.
  2. "YG Entertainment (122870:KOSDAQ): Financial Statements". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on July 23, 2013. Retrieved March 29, 2013.
  3. "JYP Entertainment Corp (035900:KOSDAQ): Financial Statements". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on July 23, 2013. Retrieved March 29, 2013.