This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cricket, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cricket articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related
[[Fast bowling#Categorisation of fast bowling|fast-medium]] The anchor (#Categorisation of fast bowling) has been deleted by other users before.
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.
Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error
Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I've moved the book to an inline citation for now - it is only being used once so there's no need for an alternative section for it. I've also reverted references back per CITEVAR and DATEVAR. If the article is re-written then whoever does so is more than welcome to do whatever they want to the citation style - assuming a significant number of citations are introduced. I've no problem with that and won't get precious about CITEVAR if that happens. To change two and leave the others as they are is, however, not really on - especially as it seems it will be more than a little while before anything's done here. Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:07, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Absolute rubbish. You clearly have no idea what a bibliography section is for. Or a further reading section for that matter. Reverted. See your own talk page. As for citations, learn how to use cite web, cite book, etc. I despair. Jack|talk page01:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Per CITEVAR and DATEVAR I'll move things back so that they match for now - nothing will get done on this for months at least and the article is a mess in its current state with multiple date and reference styles. CITEVAR also makes it very clear that no one is required to use citation templates and that normal referencing is absolutely acceptable. If it ever gets developed properly then anyone should feel free to adopt their preferred style. Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply