Talk:Initial sound rule
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 13 August 2026
[edit source]
It has been proposed in this section that Initial sound rule be renamed and moved to Word-initial /l/ and /n/ in Korean. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Initial sound rule → Word-initial rieul and nieun in Hangul
Initial sound rule → Word-initial /l/ and /n/ in Korean
This phrasing "initial sound rule" is not something I've ever encountered in academic literature. It's likely an ad-hoc translation of the term 두음법칙 by the creator of this Wikipedia article. I propose change per WP:COMMONNAME.
On the other hand, I've seen:
- "Word-initial /l/ and /n/" in The Languages of Korea (2012) p. 171
- "Word-initial /l/ and /n/" in The Korean Language (2001) p. 65
- "Word-initial /l/ and /n/" in The Korean Langauge (2000) p. 27
- "Word-initial /l/ and /n/" in The Korean Language (2006) p. 171
- "Word-initial /l/ and /n/" in The Sounds of Korean (2012) p. 212
I'm reluctant to use "/l/" and "/n/" on Wikipedia because that notation only makes sense with context of language, but I can be convinced otherwise grapesurgeon (talk) 11:56, 13 August 2026 (UTC) (edited: see below) grapesurgeon (talk) 12:31, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- I would say that a better title is Word-initial /l/ and /n/ in Korean. In this case the matter is the pronunciation in the Korean language; whether to reflect that in the hangul orthography for the Korean language comes after that. ~2026-44551-01 (talk) 12:29, 13 August 2026 (UTC)
- Ah fair enough. I'll modify my move proposal to reflect that grapesurgeon (talk) 12:30, 13 August 2026 (UTC)