Talk:Humans of New York

Philanthropy

This section was verbose, confusing, and read something like a promotional piece. I edited for clarity and conciseness.11 Arlington (talk) 05:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Spinoffs

Is this section even necessary? Do any of the spinoffs even meet WP:NOTABILITY? It's an overwhelming piece that seems to add little substance to the article, and it seems like people are using it as a dumping ground for promoting their own spinoffs. 173.77.151.156 (talk) 06:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

I agree. None are notable and most are simply inspired by the original. Rwalker^talk 15:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Vidal Chastanet

Not likely to be independently notable, but worth a mention in the larger article. No Matter How Dark (talk) 02:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

• Merge - I think a merge would be appropriate. I created it so somebody could merge or expand it. Thank you for bring it up! CookieMonster755 (talk) 02:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC) :-)
• Merge Obviously not notable enough for a standalone article, but could be mentioned here. --MelanieN (talk) 17:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Some people don't like this blog!

There's a very strong article argues about Humans of New York blog. Called The Problem With Humans of New York http://gawker.com/the-problem-with-humans-of-new-york-1617812880 . I think it worth looking at it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M7mood16 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Mp

It perfect Matt3fun (talk) 22:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Poor Organization

This article is poorly organized. I updated opening section and added Dear New York. However the middle section is poorly organized and mainly chronological. Philanthropy section could be cut way down. DKNY/Humans of New York The Series don't seem material enough for own section and could be nested into an Earlier Work section. WritingOnWall (talk) 11:19, 17 May 2026 (UTC)