Talk:HSV Senator

HSV Senator was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 21, 2025, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

HSV Senator (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which was archived on 13 November 2025. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal HSV Senator is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Peer review

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Holden Special Vehicles Senator

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I want to improve it before possibly nominating it for a GA.

Thanks, Not stuart60 (talk) 23:18, 11 October 2025 (UTC) Talk:Holden Special Vehicles Senator/GA1Reply

Response to GA Review

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Not stuart60 has been enthusiastic about this becoming a Good Article, and before the review happened I was already thinking that the article needs more about the significance of the car via its development and market role. No Good Article is without a story to tell. Nitpicking adjacent links and the passive or active voice in "The X Senator released" (I lightly disagree with your sentiment that "was released" is better btw) is really small stuff that'll only be addressable after the article has been transformed with more content. I agree that some language borders on promotional and that Wikipedia is not a historical shopping catalogue. EnjoyLightEnjoyTruth (talk) 08:52, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply