Talk:George Galloway
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Burrobert in topic Tiananmen Square
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the George Galloway article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
| The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| George Galloway is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| Question Time George Galloway in Finchley controversy was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 19 January 2017 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Galloway is now in forced Exile
[edit]Per an interview with Tucker, apparently G Galloway is now in forced exile and has his property taken from him, Inclusion warranted? Inayity (talk) 14:45, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Just because he describes it that way doesn't mean it is that way, so at best we could attribute that statement to him; and just because he says something doesn't make that opinion WP:DUE. What secondary coverage exists? What do they say? --Aquillion (talk) 14:47, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- I would indeed be surprised if this were actually true (I'm not sure what "forced exile" is supposed to actually mean) so yes at best it'd have to be attributed, if his statement is even notable. — Czello (music) 14:54, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- I Found no secondary sources that are RS.Inayity (talk) 15:03, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- If the latter bit is true, surely a reliable secondary source will cover it. The former should be included only with attribution. Yue ✉ 02:29, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- I Found no secondary sources that are RS.Inayity (talk) 15:03, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- I would indeed be surprised if this were actually true (I'm not sure what "forced exile" is supposed to actually mean) so yes at best it'd have to be attributed, if his statement is even notable. — Czello (music) 14:54, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Tiananmen Square
[edit]Regarding Galloway's 2011 remarks regarding Tiananmen Square, is this Independent article a reliable source? I found some sources criticizing him for these remarks, but they're mostly opinion pieces. JPHC2003 (talk) 08:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- It is described as a Diary so it seems like opinion and the tone of the text comes across as opinion. I can't find any decent sources which include that quote or any other coverage of Galloway's view on Tiananmen Square. It seems to be an insignificant part of his bio. Burrobert (talk) 11:24, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Alternative views articles
- Mid-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- C-Class Big Brother articles
- Mid-importance Big Brother articles
- WikiProject Big Brother articles
- C-Class Scotland articles
- Mid-importance Scotland articles
- All WikiProject Scotland pages
- C-Class socialism articles
- Mid-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- C-Class Yorkshire articles
- Mid-importance Yorkshire articles
- WikiProject Yorkshire articles
- C-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Mid-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
