Talk:Faith Versus Fact

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Religion

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Picture

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

AbdulAliAbdullah (talk) 00:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)I will try to find a picture for the bookReply

Reviews

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It'd be a good idea to look again for reviews and update the article as necessary; the current section is mostly criticism and may have been made from cherry-picked ones (like New Atlantis where there's a tendency to call proper science scientism). —Paleo Neonate – 02:58, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Can I use this article as a source?

Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I want to add this review to the reception section. ThrowawayEpic1000 (talk) 23:41, 6 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yes. I suggest you give it context, just like we note a review written by a "science journalist"; Edward Feser is a Catholic philosopher. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 01:03, 7 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have done so. ThrowawayEpic1000 (talk) 17:23, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply