Talk:Edict of Horemheb

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alleged copyright issue

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

User Johnson524 has issued a copyright concern on the English Translation subsection of this article. However, the similarity between this page and the referenced article is the English translation of the ancient artifact. This is not actually a copyright issue as there is no original writing copied. The copyright concern should be removed. Cerebrality (talk) 04:36, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Cerebrality: The section in question was a word-for-word copy of a translation which comprised of nearly half the article, which I additionally believe does not add any value to it. For reference, the Code of Hammurabi article does paste the entire code on the page, but only quotes parts of it and uses that for analysis. While reviewing your page, the analysis and history of the edict you wrote was both written and formatted quite well and I've approved the page as such, but the 10,000+ byte translation without any analysis would be better suited for Wikisource rather than here. Johnson524 04:50, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ok. Then I will only quote parts of the Edict. Cerebrality (talk) 04:56, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply