Talk:Edge (geometry)
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Adam El-Sawaf in topic Formatting on mobile of the intro section looks horrible for me
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
I changed the definition to "joining two adjacent zero-dimensional vertices" because the diagonal of a cube (or square) is not an edge. Do you agree?
- Maybe we could also change/add to the definition to allow for polytopes. Aacehm (talk) 16:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Remove zero-dimensional and one-dimensional?
[edit]I think that we can remove the word "zero-dimensional" and possibly "one-dimensional". A vertex is a point, which is zero-dimensional. While an edge is a line segment, the article on line segment does not explicitly mention a line segment as being one-dimensional, which might lead to some confusion. Aacehm (talk) 22:10, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, they seem redundant. I added some pictures and more text for edges on higher figures... Tom Ruen (talk) 22:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Formatting on mobile of the intro section looks horrible for me
[edit]Text is very squeezed to the left side of the images, like two characters per line. On iPhone btw Adam El-Sawaf (talk) 08:08, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, I got the same problem on my Pixel phone. The image gallery was formatted very badly with one image across but spread to almost the whole width of the screen. I switched to a {{multiple image}} template which looks similar on non-mobile layouts but on my phone fits two images across and doesn't try to sandwich any text beside it. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:19, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! It looks great to me now too Adam El-Sawaf (talk) 08:36, 24 January 2026 (UTC)