Talk:Duane Washington

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Duane Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121006104247/http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/ottawa_county/Ex-NBA-player-Duane-Washington-charged-in-I-96-hit-run to http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/ottawa_county/Ex-NBA-player-Duane-Washington-charged-in-I-96-hit-run

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 30 June 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. noting that Duane Washington (basketball, born 1964) was also discussed, but did not gain sufficient support (closed by non-admin page mover) — 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 16:00, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

---

Duane Washington → Duane Washington Sr. – I propose moving this article to "Duane Washington Sr.", as it is not the primary topic over Duane Washington Jr.. The base title "Duane Washington" should instead be converted into a disambiguation page. ~2026-37522-04 (talk) 10:42, 30 June 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 15:43, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:39, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose, no evidence that he is known as "Duane Washington Sr." in any reliable sources. 162 etc. (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

  @162 etc. In any case, this is not the primary topic for the name. Alternatively, the article could be moved to Duane Washington (basketball, born 1964), with the base title becoming a disambiguation page. ~2026-37700-48 (talk) 19:35, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

I also oppose this alternate suggestion. This appears to be a Vladimir Guerrero / Vladimir Guerrero Jr. situation - unless you have sources that say otherwise. 162 etc. (talk) 19:39, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose per 162 etc.. There is no reason to move this article to this proposal unless this Washington is known by "Sr.". Raskuly 🐰 18:33, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose per 162 etc. He does not seem to known as "Sr" in any refs. It's true Jr gets significantly more views, but he does seem to be "Jr" in sources. As long as Jr is prominently linked in the hatnote, a dab page would provide no additional benefit to readers. Station1 (talk) 05:17, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose as proposed, but support Duane Washington (basketball, born 1964). Not primary topic and both are called Duane Washington, whether a Jr is added or not. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:26, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.