Talk:Daniel Raymond

Economics Low‑importance

	Economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Modern philosophy

WikiProject class rating

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

biased account

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Raymond said a lot more than this biased account. 108.28.145.40 (talk) 17:43, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Too much original material

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is too much based on primary sources, mainly his own writings. We need to base the article on him more on secondary sources that tell us about him.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:48, 2 April 2026 (UTC)Reply