Talk:Cusper
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cusper article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Cusper be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
The lede is too damn long now
[edit]See MOS:LEAD. Should be a summary of the article, not a psychologist defending the concept. We should especially avoid overquoting in the lede, see WP:OVERQUOTE: The lead section of an article should be limited to a summary about the topic, rather than a collection of long quotations. The guideline WP:LEAD explains the suggested style of the lead section, as being just an overview as introductory lead paragraphs. However, special care should be taken to avoid long direct quotes in the lead, from specific sources. Instead, write concise, plain text which could be adjusted, or extended, also by other editors, to better reflect current ideas about the article's topic. A major problem with quotes in the lead is the concern about giving WP:UNDUE weight to one or a few sources within the limited space of the lead section. The general goal is to allow the lead to contain free-form text which can be altered, easily, to reflect both old and new issues, which might not be covered by quoting from an older source which lacks the new perspectives.
- Scarpy (talk) 02:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)