Talk:Copper peptide GHK-Cu

Review

Request new page review by specialist with a background in science/chemistry. Cindamuse (talk) 17:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Copper peptide GHK-Cu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324030906/http://www.mcbiotec.com/file/msds%20copper%20peptide.pdf to http://www.mcbiotec.com/file/msds%20copper%20peptide.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

DNA repair !?

Why is a section on "increased production of growth factors bFGF and VGF" titled "DNA repair"!? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper_peptide_GHK-Cu#DNA_repair --Bstard12 (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Link Please

"Recent studies revealed its ability to modulate expression of a large number of human genes, generally reversing gene expression to a healthier state." 2603:6000:D7F0:1970:11CE:C1D8:FCEE:5313 (talk) 00:58, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed external link: Peptides.io GHK-Cu guide

Could an uninvolved editor please review whether the following link would be appropriate for an External links section in this article, if such a section is considered suitable under WP:EL and WP:ELNO?

Proposed link:

• Peptides.io GHK-Cu guide – plain-language overview of GHK-Cu/copper peptide, including general background, cosmetic-use context, mechanism overview, research limitations, and safety disclaimers

I am asking here rather than adding it directly because GHK-Cu is a biomedical/cosmetic peptide topic, and I want to avoid adding anything that editors may consider promotional, non-neutral, or unsuitable as an external link. If editors feel this link is not appropriate for the article, I am fine with leaving it out.

For transparency, I work with Peptides.io, so I am requesting review by uninvolved editors rather than adding the link myself, in line with WP:COI.

Andrei25luks (talk) 07:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi Andrei25luks. Thank you for your suggestion, but I am declining your proposed edit. Two other editors have concluded that peptides.io is not an appropriate external link, and after reviewing the website myself, I concur. This article is tagged as needing more reliable medical sources (which typically refers to peer-reviewed articles in medical journals), but the webpage that you linked is more of a general guide. Based on the responses from other editors to your other edit requests, there appears to be consensus against including peptides.io as an external link. Altamel (talk) 03:10, 31 July 2026 (UTC)