Talk:Chope (platform)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Chope Logo.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 22 May 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Overwhelming support from data. (non-admin closure) Jacksonvil (alt) (talk) (contribs) (Main account) 06:19, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

---

• Chope → Chope (platform)
• Chope (disambiguation) → Chope

– Not primary because of the existence of Chope (Ninjago). GTrang (talk) 00:24, 22 May 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:29, 29 May 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. ⹃Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley$\lor$investigateᛅ} 02:07, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose, justified primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 01:06, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
• Weak oppose this does seem to be the only usage but PTMs do come up on Google. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:31, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
• Per WP:DPT, we can look at some of the standard stats. WikiNav view of clickstreams does not even render the first graph because of so little data - so there's no obvious proof of primary topic from the volume. All-time mass views show Christopher Chope is 8 times more likely to be known by readers, and it's just a single biography of a politician. I checked if the platform appears in written sources - none that I can find in either Google Books or Scholar searches. Most mentions seem to be acronyms, people's names and the Singaporean term. This is obviously too niche a term to a have a genuine primary topic. (Support) --Joy (talk) 11:04, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Food and drink has been notified of this discussion. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 00:28, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

• Support per nomination and per detailed examination by Joy. If consensus were to prefer Chope → Chope (online platform) [analogous to Singapore's Carro (online car marketplace)], I would support such an alternative option. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:58, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose Christopher Chope should be included on the DAB page, but is not major enough to be referred to commonly on a last-name basis. The platform is the primary topic here. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:08, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
• Support. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Give it another go because it's close and has good evidence to work with. ⹃Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley$\lor$investigateᛅ} 02:07, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

1. topic that is not major (80.0%)
2. topic that is supposed to be primary (10.0%)

The idea that the person is not major enough, but then a topic with far less interest is major enough to be a primary topic, is just odd. --Joy (talk) 10:20, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Support. Not specifically because of the Ninjago article, but because there's several topics on the page that collectively give the platform less of a hold on the status of "primary topic". Especially with the pageview statistics mentioned by User:Joy, the safest bet is to have the disambiguation page at the basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 21:59, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
• Support. There is nowhere near enough evidence for the claim that this reservation system serving only Singapore, Hong Kong, Bangkok, Shanghai, Bali, Phuket, and Jakarta, is primary when the other seven meanings are taken together. Andrewa (talk) 02:35, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.