Talk:China Cables
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
| The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
Merge with Xinjiang papers
[edit]the 2 pages Xinjiang papers China Cables should be merged ? P5EE5Eec5 (talk) 10:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing this out. I am not sure. I understand, that the 2 terms, though both referring to confidential Chinese government documents, definitely do not refer to the same documents, but two different troves of documents, i.e. the 2 terms cannot be used interchangeably. That is why I removed "or Xinjiang Papers" from the lede, which an editor had inserted, to avoid misunderstanding. The New York Times published the Xinjiang Papers on Nov 16 and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists ICIJ published the China Cables on Nov 24. The latter seems to provide more detail and be of larger scale. I am interested what others think--Wuerzele (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- No,P5EE5Eec5. The 2 terms, though both referring to confidential Chinese government documents, do not refer to the same, but to two different publications, i.e. the 2 terms cannot be used interchangeably. The New York Times had published the Xinjiang Papers on Nov 16, 2019 and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists ICIJ and with it some 17 other associated largely European news agencies/ newspapers published the China Cables on Nov 24. The two entities do not even refer to each other´s publications. I have not seen the terms being used interchangeably. I recommend to remove the merge sign from the page, if there are no further opinions.--Wuerzele (talk) 06:45, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:36, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Low-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Start-Class Islam-related articles
- Low-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- Start-Class Human rights articles
- Mid-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- Wikipedia articles under general sanctions