Talk:Charles Hutton Gregory

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The portrait of Charles Hutton Gregory is the same as that used in the article on his father Olinthus Gregory. Which is correct? Barney Bruchstein (talk) 11:50, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

It seems to have been a mistake made by this publication which was the original source of the image. The file here seems to show the original 1834 caption describing it as the father (the date alone would indicate that it's the father shown). I will remove the file from the article and request its deletion at Wikimedia Commons (since the other version is better quality). Thanks for spotting this - Dumelow (talk) 11:57, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply