Talk:Cargo 200 (code name)

“Zinc-lined coffins”

Is tsinkovyi grob (“zinc coffin”) properly translated as “galvanized steel coffin,” or “galvanized steel-lined coffin”? In Russian, galvanizing is tsinkovainie, literally zincing. —Michael Z. 19:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Website nonfunctional

The website is down, and apparently leads to some gambling website. Please use Wayback Machine. 67.169.138.27 (talk) 14:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

is there a code for ordering new soldiers?

in german bundeswehr there was one, but I forgot it.... 84.191.14.113 (talk) 18:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 4 October 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. (WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is a particularly discretionary multi-factor standard and participants were split without a clearly stronger position.) SilverLocust 💬 23:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

---

Cargo 200 (code name) → Cargo 200 – it is an invalid disambig page with only two meanings --Altenmann >talk 23:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. asilvering (talk) 20:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Update: third meaning added, i.e., there now must be a second move, Cargo 200->Cargo 200 (disambiguation) --Altenmann >talk 16:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Whatever it is that the nominator was trying to say, there is no rule that says a disambiguation page needs to have more than two entries. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 04:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Yes there is: WP:ONEOTHER. Cargo 200 (code name) is clearly a primary topic; the film is named after it. --Altenmann >talk 18:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

WP:ONEOTHER doesn't say that a disambiguation page needs to have more than two entries. It only says that a disambiguation page is not necessary if there are only two topics and one of them is a primary topic for the term. Being the original source of a term does not make a topic automatically primary, but perhaps the code name is primary in this instance. There is a third topic: 200rf.com (aka Look for Your Own). Its launch in February 2022 seems to have been responsible for a big spike in interest in March 2022 (echoed a year later in March 2023). It gets about 11% of the page views of the three topics combined. The code name gets about 52% and the film gets about 37%. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 23:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

200rf does not belong to this disambig page; the name not nearly close, and I removed it. --Altenmann >talk 01:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

• Leaning support. I agree with the removal of 200rf.com, which obliquely alludes to the disambiguated term, but is not the term, and I tend to agree that Cargo 200 (code name) is the primary topic of the term based on relative historical importance. BD2412 T 18:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

The oblique reference seems sufficient to list it under "See also". —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose as there does not seem to be a primary topic here, in which case the base name must host (or redirect to) a dab page per WP:NOPRIMARY. Mdewman6 (talk) 06:50, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Yes there is the primary meaning. Nobody knows the film. --Altenmann >talk 16:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
• Support - The Russian catchphrase is the primary topic here. FOARP (talk) 14:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
• Comment there are 3 topics available, there is a painting by Pavel Otdelnov -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 07:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
• Slightly leaning oppose: The page view split between the code name and the film is only 58% versus 42% for the last two years. That doesn't look like a clear primary topic. The article about the term seems like not much more than a dictionary definition. The addition of the painting further leans us toward retaining disambiguation. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Opposed Although, clearly one came about because of the other. Primary topic threshold has not been met. Outside of a spike in 2022, looking at both articles over a long term (which is a defining mark for deciding primary topic), both articles see almost equal traffic.

https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2015-07&end=2024-09&pages=Cargo_200_(film)%7CCargo_200_(code_name) RCSCott91 (talk) 04:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.