Talk:Bulsae-4

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bulsae-4 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Asian / Korean / Southeast Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Incorrect assertion of designation

Latest comment: 1 day ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Missile in question is not designated Bulsae-4 as such is for reengineered Bulsae-2 that implemented rear aspect laser beam riding SACLOS and Bulsae-4M is modernization that has modernized launching post with miniaturized components. Also it is not Bulsae-5 as that is designation for 9M133 or clone of 9M133. CybermancySFRY (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, the article is based on a false designation used by some bloggers and then repeated elsewhere. --EndlessUnknown (talk) 12:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 9 August 2026

Latest comment: 1 day ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It has been proposed in this section that Bulsae-4 be renamed and moved somewhere else, with the name being decided below.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log

Bulsae-4 → ? – As previously mentioned, the designation Bulsae-4 is proven to belong to an improved version of the 9M111 missile/9K111 launcher. If no better designation is found, simply renaming it M-2018 might be an alternative EndlessUnknown (talk) 12:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply