Talk:Bawitius

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bawitius possible size

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

According to this article, this species was large. How large, though? Any estimates from the holotype available? Tnophelia (talk) 17:38, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article implies that according to the fragmentary remains, Bawitius may have been five times larger than modern bichirs. Obviously, one of us needs to get ahold of the paper, itself, to put in concrete measurements.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Grandstaff et al.2012 (JVP 32(1)17-26) state "∼250–300 cm in estimated total length"Ozraptor4 (talk) 02:46, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply