Talk:Automated tank cleaning machine

Promotional bias?

This article seems to contain a lot of promotion for the Butterworth company. Besides the claim of invention, they appear to be irrelevant to the topic.12.116.62.222 (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

The above comment is ten years old. Since then more content has been added, but there remains a bias, this time in favour of Gamajet (eg. all the images are of this one product line). There are at least a dozen notable suppliers of automated tank cleaning equipment; it seems unjustified to dedicate this article to only one or two of them. Views? DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello editors,

I've reviewed the article and noticed several issues with neutrality and reliable sourcing:

1. Product specs for both Alfa Laval (Gamajet) and Butterworth are cited from manufacturer sources ([1], [4]), which are self-published. These violate WP:RS and WP:NPOV.
2. The article repeatedly highlights Gamajet's benefits (e.g., reducing confined space entry), yet the citation used ([9]) is a general OSHA page that does not mention Gamajet. This is misleading.
3. Three product photos in the article exclusively feature Gamajet-branded equipment, which creates an appearance of promotional bias.
4. Statements such as "widely used" and detailed technical specifications are not backed by third-party or independent sources.
5. The article dedicates a large amount of text and image space to only two vendors, which may violate WP:UNDUE.

Suggested edits:

• Replace marketing claims with neutral descriptions (e.g., “Some rotary impingement systems are designed to reduce confined space entry”).
• Remove or reword all vendor performance specs unless backed by third-party industry sources.
• Consider replacing at least one Gamajet image with a neutral schematic or unrelated tank cleaning machine.

Tysonlane (talk) 19:31, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Automated tank cleaning machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120183426/http://www.butterworth.com/about-us.aspx to http://www.butterworth.com/about-us.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110302022639/http://www.butterworth.com:80/Data_Sheets/Tank_Cleaning_K_SK_SSK.pdf to http://www.butterworth.com/Data_Sheets/Tank_Cleaning_K_SK_SSK.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)