Talk:Anamniotes

Animals Low‑importance

Anamniotes is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Nucleated red blood cells

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Loss of nucleus in red blood cells is a characteristic of mammals, and not of amniotes. This item in the list should be deleted.Teaktl17 (talk) 21:05, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

No input, the list item removed. Teaktl17 (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why are amniotes listed under "Cladistically included but traditionally excluded taxa"?

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Amniotes cannot be anamniotes, anamniotes are purely paraphyletic and cannot be redefinable as monophyletic to cladistically include amniotes Cantthinkofanyusername (talk) 06:02, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply