This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
A number of editors have been removing material from this article, ostensibly on the basis that it is "negative". The material is supported by multiple independent and reliable sources, and seems relevant (the fact that there has been sustained coverage means that its absence would render the article incomplete). The fact that it is "negative" - that the subject or their PR people might not like it - is not a reason for removal.--IdiotSavant (talk) 06:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I also note that the previous iteration of this article (and other articles related to Breingan's business interests) was the subject of a sustained campaign of promotional edits by a sock network. See
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Though I understand that Wikipedia isn't censored, a lot of these articles under the financial issues are from a single reporter which seems to share anything about the subject that they can find. Can we clean this up as it's very unbalanced. Only a few of the articles are written by another news outlet, information about the receivership overall and another production company website that had been found, but everything else is cited from a single reporter in the NZ Herald. I don't think this seems fair on the subject and this should be looked at. Information about the furniture issue in Los Angeles was a civil dispute not one that needed to be published or shared here. I don't know the subject but I have been following the story and I have seen how unfair the media has been. That's just my opinion. Thank you! MonkeyMonkeyHere (talk) 18:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you feel that the New Zealand Herald's coverage is unfair, you should raise it directly with them, or with the New Zealand Media Council. Wikipedia is not the proper place to litigate such issues. IdiotSavant (talk) 02:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@IdiotSavant Wikipedia is supposed to summarise what is reported in secondary sources not provide details of every news update on a subject. The content itself is given far too much weight, why is a failed kickstarter project more important than his work for Food TV and Living Channel? Per WP:VNOT you need to seek consensus for restoring this content. Traumnovelle (talk) 08:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Normally articles about producers include information about their notable projects. And these projects have become notable because of the context of business failure and an attempt to restart a career they have been reported in. Given the complaint about Wikipedia:Proseline over on WPBIO, maybe now is the time to rewrite them to better reflect that.
I would say there was consensus for its inclusion before the censorship campaign stepped up a notch this month. Of course, consensus can change... IdiotSavant (talk) 09:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article in regards to the business outcome isn't fairly sourced. It only cites sources from a single journalist which doesn't demonstrate independent or broad recognition. This does present concerns around WP:UNDUE and WP:RS. Without substantial, independent coverage from multiple sources, the information on the business outcome needs to be notable which depending on a single journalist, doesn't cover Wikipedia's inclusion standards. Maybe I am wrong, but having an expert to check would be suitable. HammerDanceLi (talk) 01:06, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
As noted uppage, if you feel that the New Zealand Herald's coverage is unfair, you should raise it directly with them, or with the New Zealand Media Council. Wikipedia is not the proper place to litigate such issues. IdiotSavant (talk) 02:40, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
