Talk:Adolph Smith
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Zeibgeist in topic Feedback from New Page Review process
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hi there, nice work overall on this article. I wanted to let you know that Ancestry.com is not considered a suitable source on Wikipedia, as noted at WP:ANCESTRY. Is there another source that verifies the material in the early life section that's currently sourced to Ancestry.com?
Zeibgeist (talk) 03:10, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Zeibgeist for pointing out Ancestry as an unreliable source. I have excluded some info and replaced the Ancestry citations with reliable references.
- Rudypoo Rudypoo (talk) 02:18, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Rudypoo: Thanks for the reply and the updates to the article. The sourcing is looking better. I notice that there are a number of sources lacking page numbers, which I've tagged inline. Would you be able to add page numbers for those sources? Zeibgeist (talk) 02:29, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
