Talk:Adipose tissue

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adipose tissue article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

Biology Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Adipose tissue is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anatomy: Gross High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Adipose tissue received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

cellulite

Why does cellulite redirect here? There's nothing in this article about cellulite. -- Kimiko 21:01, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)

good point. I'll make a stubb ;-) Erich 01:56, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)

How about adding a stub to the "Adipocyte" entry. Because a tissue is something cpmpletely different than a certain type of cells? --Frosty 21:24, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

What's with the section on mice fat?

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

How exactly does this contribute to this article? I understand that research on mice is important in scientific research, but isn't the point of Wikipedia to further the knowledge of most readers, not scientists? Granted, like many pages in biology, this encyclopaedia talks about more than humans (animals too) but it just seems out of place to me. Am I missing something? meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 23:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Many years later, but I agree that it makes no sense. Moved the mice section down to animal studies and renamed that heading, because it was already only about mice. Jrcollins (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply