This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Latest comment: 10 months ago5 comments3 people in discussion
SUCCESSFULLY MERGED
The result of the discussion was merge per previous AfD and points brought forward by nominator. Only opposer provided no reasoning. Note that WP:MERGE doesn't recommend notifying the creators of an article, and even if it did, Wikipedia is WP:NOTABUREAUCRACY: A procedural error made in a proposal or request is not grounds for rejecting that proposal or request.FaviFake (talk) 19:22, 27 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The 2024 AfD arrived at "no consensus", with an explicit note from the closer that discussing a potential merge on the talk would be a good way forward. Given the length of the article and the sourcing, I believe readers would be better served if they saw this content in Hobnob_biscuit#History. There shouldn't be any issues with undue weight. To fully understand the Hobnob biscuit's history you'd have to read this article anyway, and to fully understand the Abbey Crunch's fate you'd have to read the Hobnob article, given the Abbey Crunch was a precursor to it and they're virtually identical in all but name. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋22:31, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.