Talk:ASP.NET MVC

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Microsoft (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft

untitled

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Article needs to have brief descriptions of what each release provided.--76.126.182.92 (talk) 08:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article should be update

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article should be updated because a lot has happened and the details about the view engines have changes. Razor is now the prefered view engine. Robert Sundström (talk) 22:10, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, this statement is no longer accurate, as the wizards now default to the Razor view engines: "By default, the view engine in the MVC framework uses regular .aspx pages to design the layout of the user interface pages onto which the data is composed." 207.156.50.129 (talk) 20:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Open Source

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I link the thread title because an editor is apparently unclear what it means. Retitled § appropriately. 72.228.189.184 (talk) 01:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Subject term

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Use of the word lightweight.

Subjective? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.237.64.150 (talk) 15:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

vNext will be mutli-platform

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

ASP.NET will be multi-platform since the vNext version.

It will be supported on Mac OS X, Linux and who knows.Shimmy (talk) 10:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure licensing problem

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

System.Web.Mvc.dll references System.Web.WebPages.dll

System.Web.WebPages.dll references Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure.dll

Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure.dll comes with Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure.nupkg package: (Unable to uninstall 'Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure 1.0.0.0' because 'Microsoft.AspNet.WebPages 3.2.3' depends on it)

Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure's source code was not published on CodePlex, it's license is Microsoft EULA.

So, one can't build Asp.NET MVC from sources (or at least he will be forced to bring binary .nupkg with binary code build by third party) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsen.Shnurkov (talk • contribs) 04:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Obsolete

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Regarding "The source code now resides on CodePlex."

CodePlex has been shot down. The source code probably found a new home.

--Mortense (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply