Talk:126th Operations Group

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 126th Operations Group article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / World War II / Cold War / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

Undefined references

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Lineagegeek! In this edit you added a couple of footnotes fo ra citation named "Maurer495BS", but no such citation is defined here. This leaves the artilce more difficult to verify, and it renders with some error messages. Are you able to provide the missing references to clean up the material and fix the errors?

Further, I noticed there are sevreal footnotes which are either ambiguous or undefined, so I have tagged the article with {{refimprove}}. The referencing is quite poor--perhaps the artilce should be moved to draft space until these issues can be addressed. -- mikeblas (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Mikeblas: The Bibliography is now expanded (how did I leave that out?), so the references to Rust, Anderson, Johnson and Craven & Cate are now defined. And The first entry of the Maurer cite is also defined. Lineagegeek (talk) 16:01, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yay! Thanks for the fixes! -- mikeblas (talk) 00:00, 30 July 2025 (UTC)Reply