Draft talk:Hyperliquid
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 6 days ago by Lacanic in topic Reliable Sources
| This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Andrew Tate on Hyperliquid 2. Kaiko Research on Hyperliquid 3. Airdrop overview on Hyperliquid Belle Femme Emmo (talk) 06:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Regarding this edit: The new source is poor. Also, restoring old content with a new source slapped on is WP:BACKWARDS. Further,
Coverage of the episode highlighted...
is editorializing, and it also reads like AI. - Especially for BLP content, you need to start from reliable sources. A CN template only works if the basics are already there. This isn't the case. Grayfell (talk) 07:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Reliable Sources
[edit]For this to be considered on AfC - I'd suggest trying to focus on the WP:GOLDENRULE - and finding three high quality independent articles about it from WP:RSP
Would be one, so just need two more. All the other details on the article read like noise until this can be established first. Lacanic (talk) 02:24, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Draft-Class company pages
- NA-importance company pages
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Draft-Class Finance & Investment pages
- NA-importance Finance & Investment pages
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- Draft-Class WikiProject Business pages
- NA-importance WikiProject Business pages
- WikiProject Business articles
- Draft-Class Computing pages
- NA-importance Computing pages
- All Computing articles
- Draft-Class WikiProject Cryptocurrency pages
- NA-importance WikiProject Cryptocurrency pages
- WikiProject Cryptocurrency articles