This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Sustainable Development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sustainable development and Sustainable development-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sustainable DevelopmentWikipedia:WikiProject Sustainable DevelopmentTemplate:WikiProject Sustainable DevelopmentSustainable Development
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
"Wikipedia editorial team may verify personal communications"
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please note that Wikipedia does not "verify personal communications", as suggested in this edit. There would be no point whatsoever in doing so because Wikipedia does not permit unpublished personal communications to be cited as sources. I have already pointed this out to you on your talk page (see ), and attempted to make it clear to you that to establish that this article meets the notability criteria necessary for an article to be accepted, it needs to cite, and be based almost entirely on, independent published reliable sources which directly discuss the article topic in depth. Please take the time to read the policies before proceeding further, as I am afraid that otherwise you will simply be wasting your time creating an article that will be subject to immediate rejection. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
