Draft:Refractor Engine
Submission declined on 3 August 2026 by EaglesFan37 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Refractor Engine | |
|---|---|
| Original authors | Refraction Games Digital Illusions CE |
| Developer | Electronic Arts |
| Release | 1999 |
| Stable release | Refractor Engine 2
|
| Written in | C++ |
| Platform | Cross-platform |
| Type | Game engine |
| License | Proprietary |
Refractor Engine is a game engine developed by the Swedish studio Refraction Games. It debuted with the release of Codename Eagle in 1999. Following the acquisition of Refraction Games by Digital Illusions CE, ownership of the engine was transferred to DICE. The engine was subsequently redesigned and used as the foundation for several games in the Battlefield series.[1]
Games using Refractor Engine
[edit]Refractor Engine
[edit]- Codename Eagle (1999)[2]
Refractor Engine 2
[edit]- Battlefield 1942 (2002), including its expansion packs[3]
- Battlefield Vietnam (2004)[3]
- Battlefield 2 (2005), including its expansion packs[3]
- Battlefield 2142 (2006)[3]
- Battlefield Heroes (2009)[3]
- Battlefield Play4Free (2011)[4]
References
[edit]- ↑ "Battlefield 1942 Q&A". Retrieved 2011-06-06.
- ↑ "3D Engine: Refractor". Retrieved 2011-06-06.
- 1 2 3 4 5 "3D Engine: Refractor 2". Retrieved 2011-06-06.
- ↑ "Battlefield Play4Free" (in Polish). Retrieved 2011-06-06.
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.