Draft:Fire weather
Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,535 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Fire weather is the combination of atmospheric conditions — high temperature, low relative humidity, strong or erratic wind, and an unstable atmosphere — that increases the likelihood of wildfire ignition and the speed and intensity with which a fire, once started, will spread.[1] The term is standard usage among the U.S. National Weather Service (NWS) and its parent agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), as well as the National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) — whose member agencies include the National Park Service and the U.S. Forest Service — and is used internationally by agencies such as Natural Resources Canada.[1][2][3] Fire weather is forecast on time horizons ranging from same-day tactical warnings to multi-day outlooks, and a variety of specialized indices exist to quantify fire danger from weather and fuel-moisture data.[4][5]
Meteorological factors
[edit]Four meteorological elements are most commonly cited as driving fire weather risk: low relative humidity, strong surface wind, an unstable atmosphere, and antecedent drought or dryness.[1] The U.S. National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS), developed by the U.S. Forest Service, breaks these down into components including the Spread Component (forward rate of fire spread), the Energy Release Component (potential available energy at the head of a fire), and the Ignition Component (probability that a fire will start and require suppression if a firebrand reaches fine fuels).[6] High temperature and low humidity dry out fine, fast-drying fuels such as grass, leaf litter, and cured vegetation, making them easier to ignite, while sustained wind both supplies oxygen to combustion and physically spreads flame and embers ahead of a fire front.[1][4] Lightning is also a significant natural ignition source under fire weather conditions, particularly "dry lightning" — cloud-to-ground strikes accompanied by less than 0.10 inches (2.5 mm) of precipitation — which can ignite dry fuels without the rainfall that would otherwise help suppress a resulting fire.[7]
Forecasting and outlooks
[edit]In the United States, fire weather is forecast at two timescales. The NWS Storm Prediction Center (SPC) issues Day 1 and Day 2 categorical Fire Weather Outlooks (each covering a 12:00–12:00 UTC period), rating areas as Elevated, Critical, or Extremely Critical based on sustained wind speed, minimum relative humidity, temperature, and fuel dryness, each sustained for at least three hours; thresholds are relaxed somewhat for Florida.[8] Extremely Critical, the highest category, is reserved for conditions that deviate significantly from climatological norms, or for borderline conditions occurring during exceptional drought.[8] SPC also issues extended, non-categorical Day 3–8 fire weather outlooks.[9] On a shorter, tactical timescale, local NWS forecast offices issue Red Flag Warnings when Elevated-to-Extreme fire danger (per the National Fire Danger Rating System) coincides with forecast sustained wind of at least 15 mph, relative humidity at or below 25%, and temperature above 75°F (with some regional variation), typically following at least a week or two of dry conditions.[4][10] A related but less urgent Fire Weather Watch may be issued to advise of conditions that could result in extensive wildland fire occurrence or extreme fire behavior expected to develop in the next 12 to 48 hours (up to 72 hours), or within 12 hours in cases of dry lightning.[2]
Measurement and indices
[edit]Several indices translate weather and fuel-moisture observations into a numerical fire-danger rating; consistent with Wikipedia's summary style, each is treated in detail in its own article and only summarized here. In the United States, the National Fire Danger Rating System produces the Spread Component, Energy Release Component, and Ignition Component described above.[6] The Fosberg Fire Weather Index (FFWI), developed by USDA Forest Service researcher Michael A. Fosberg and presented in 1978, combines temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed into a fast-response 0–100 rating tuned to fine, quickly drying fuels such as grass and litter, rather than long-term drought.[11] Canada, France, Australia, and other countries use the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) System, first issued in 1970 by the Canadian Forestry Service after several years of research, and now one component of the broader Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System.[12][3][5]
The Haines Index was developed by Donald Haines, a USDA Forest Service research meteorologist, and published in 1988 as a lower-atmosphere severity index measuring the potential for dry, unstable air to produce large or erratic fire behavior.[13] Haines himself described the index as preliminary, writing in his original paper that it was "a first effort ... [that] will undoubtedly require further refinement and/or additional components," and later told Potter he had envisioned an iterative refinement process incorporating feedback from fire practitioners — a process cut short by his retirement shortly after publication.[14] Citing new science indicating the information was better assessed through other forecast fields, the National Weather Service discontinued Haines Index and the related Lightning Activity Level (LAL) index as elements of its Fire Weather Forecast, spot forecast, and fire weather matrix products effective on or about February 1, 2025, replacing them with mixing height, thunder probability, and quantitative precipitation forecast information.[15] The NWCG Fire Weather Subcommittee separately recommended the same discontinuation for its own training and curricula, citing research indicating the Haines Index was unsupported as a predictor of large fire growth and was not, properly speaking, a metric of atmospheric stability.[16]
Fire-generated weather
[edit]Sufficiently intense wildfires can generate their own convective weather, a phenomenon known as pyroconvection. The heat, smoke, and moisture released by a large fire form a rising plume that, given a sufficiently unstable atmosphere, can develop into a pyrocumulus cloud and, with enough moisture, intensify further into a full pyrocumulonimbus (pyroCb) thunderstorm — formally classified by the World Meteorological Organization as cumulonimbus flammagenitus.[17][18] A worldwide record of pyroCb events from 2013–2021 indicates the phenomenon is "neither new nor rare," though instances of fire-generated storms reaching the stratosphere have increased since 2013.[19] Counterintuitively, pyroCb thunderstorms are not typically associated with significant precipitation reaching the ground. They can, however, produce lightning, hail, damaging downdraft winds, and tornadoes.[19] These storms can drive smoke plumes to altitudes of 10 to 15 kilometers, penetrating the stratosphere at heights comparable to a moderate volcanic eruption.[20] Lightning generated by a pyroCb can strike with little or no accompanying rainfall — a phenomenon called dry lightning, caused when raindrops evaporate in the hot, dry air beneath the storm (virga) — allowing a fire to ignite new, separate fires nearby.[18][20]
The 2002 North American fire season alone produced 17 separate pyroCb events, including those generated by Colorado's Hayman Fire and Arizona's Rodeo–Chediski Fire — at the time the largest fires recorded in either state's history, both human-caused. The Rodeo–Chediski pyroCb, on June 20, 2002, registered the maximum Haines index value of 6 and an estimated cloud-top altitude of about 10.2 km.[21]
In late July 2026, wildfires in southwestern France and Spain forced roughly 325,000 people to evacuate; experts said the fires generated pyrocumulonimbus storms for what was reportedly the first time observed in France, with fire intensity described by one researcher as comparable to "several atomic bombs."[20]
Effects/impacts
[edit]Fire weather most directly affects how fast and how far a wildfire spreads once ignited. In the 2018 Camp Fire, downslope winds reaching 50–60 knots (roughly 57–69 mph) at exposed locations on the western slopes of the Sierra Nevada, peaking in the hours around sunrise, drove the fire from its ignition point near Pulga, California, to the outskirts of the town of Paradise within about 90 minutes; the fire went on to burn roughly 70,000 acres (28,000 ha) in its first 24 hours, ultimately killing 85 people and destroying nearly 20,000 structures — at the time the deadliest and most destructive wildfire in California history.[22] The National Weather Service's Sacramento office had issued a Red Flag Warning for the region two days ahead of the fire's ignition.[22] Pacific Gas & Electric had warned on November 6 and 7 of possible preemptive power shutoffs across nine Northern California counties, but ultimately did not carry them out, having judged that wind forecasts fell short of the utility's own shutoff criteria — relative humidity below 20%, sustained winds above 25 mph, and gusts exceeding roughly 45 mph — even though observed winds at some exposed sites went on to exceed those thresholds.[22]
A 2026 study in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, based on 19 focus groups with 85 participants across all six NWS regions, found that fire management agencies consistently value Red Flag Warnings but use them in a supportive rather than an initiating role: participants described using the warnings to confirm existing suppression strategies, build situational awareness for less experienced personnel, and lend credibility to public messaging and resource requests, rather than as the first signal prompting a change in strategy.[23]
Utilities in California and Oregon have also responded to forecast fire weather by proactively cutting power to reduce ignition risk from electrical equipment — so-called Public Safety Power Shutoffs; one such shutoff by Pacific Gas & Electric in October 2019 was estimated to have cost California's economy up to $2.5 billion.[24]
Notable fire weather events
[edit]Yellowstone fires (1988)
[edit]An unusually wet spring in Yellowstone National Park gave way to the driest summer in the park's recorded history, with essentially no measurable rain falling for nearly three months.[25] A series of dry cold-frontal passages produced repeated lightning without rain, igniting most of the season's fires, and each front also drove sustained high winds that rapidly spread fires already burning.[25] On August 20, 1988 — later called "Black Saturday" — wind-driven growth roughly doubled the park's burned area in a single day, to more than 480,000 acres (190,000 ha).[25] By the time snow halted the fires' advance in mid-September, about 793,880 acres (36 percent of the park) had burned; some 63 percent of that total resulted from fires that started outside the park boundary and burned in, including the North Fork Fire, the largest single fire at over 410,000 acres.[25] Extreme fire behavior associated with the event included convection reaching the stratosphere as pyrocumulonimbus.[21]
2016 Fort McMurray wildfire (Alberta, Canada)
[edit]An unusually hot, dry air mass over northern Alberta brought temperatures of 32.8°C (91°F) and relative humidity as low as 12% on May 3, 2016, followed by 31.9°C (89°F) and winds gusting to 72 km/h (45 mph) on May 4.[26] An El Niño-driven dry fall and winter, combined with a warm spring, had left minimal snowpack, creating what one analysis called a "perfect storm" of conditions for explosive wildfire growth.[26] The resulting fire forced the evacuation of more than 88,000 residents — the largest wildfire evacuation in Alberta's history — and caused an estimated C$8.9 billion in damage, the costliest disaster in Canadian history at the time.[27] The fire itself generated pyrocumulus clouds and began producing its own lightning as it grew, and is the subject of John Vaillant's 2023 book Fire Weather.[20]
2018 Camp Fire (California, U.S.)
[edit]See the Effects/impacts section above for a detailed account of the fire weather conditions driving the Camp Fire.
January 2025 Palisades and Eaton fires (Los Angeles, U.S.)
[edit]Five days ahead of the first ignition, the NWS began warning of extreme Santa Ana wind and fire conditions, escalating from a Fire Weather Watch to a Red Flag Warning and, on January 6, to a "Particularly Dangerous Situation" designation. The Palisades Fire ignited the following morning, January 7, and spread rapidly; the Eaton Fire broke out shortly after, expanding past 200 acres within an hour. That evening, the NWS reported a wind gust of 99 mph near Altadena.[28] Particularly Dangerous Situation Red Flag Warnings recurred through the fires' first week and a half, remaining in effect as late as January 15.[28] The Palisades and Eaton fires became among the most destructive in California history since records began in 1932, forcing evacuation orders affecting roughly 88,000 people, destroying more than 12,000 structures, and killing at least 25.[28]
July 2026 southwestern France and Spain wildfires
[edit]These fires generated pyrocumulonimbus storms reportedly for the first time observed in France, forcing roughly 325,000 evacuations.[20]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- 1 2 3 4 "Fire Weather Definitions". National Weather Service, Gray, Maine. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- 1 2 "fire weather watch". National Wildfire Coordinating Group. July 7, 2026. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- 1 2 "Canada's Fire Weather Index System". Natural Resources Canada. July 16, 2025. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- 1 2 3 "Red Flag Warning / Fire Weather Watch Definitions". National Weather Service, Boulder, Colorado. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- 1 2 "CFFDRS: Fire Weather Index (FWI) System". National Wildfire Coordinating Group. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- 1 2 "Predictive Services Glossary". National Interagency Fire Center / Geographic Area Coordination Center. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- ↑ "Dry Lightning Ignited Wildfires in June 2021". National Weather Service, Flagstaff, Arizona. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- 1 2 "SPC Fire Weather Forecast Criteria" (PDF). NOAA Storm Prediction Center. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- ↑ "Storm Prediction Center Day 1 Fire Weather Outlook". NOAA Storm Prediction Center. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- ↑ "Red Flag Warning Tips". National Weather Service, Marquette, Michigan. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- ↑ Fosberg, Michael A. (1978). Weather in wildland fire management: the Fire Weather Index. Conference on Sierra Nevada Meteorology. South Lake Tahoe, California: American Meteorological Society / USDA Forest Service.
- ↑ Van Wagner, C. E. (1974). Structure of the Canadian forest fire weather index. Ottawa: Canadian Forest Service, Department of the Environment. Publication No. 1333.
- ↑ "Haines Index Explained" (PDF). National Weather Service, Roanoke, Virginia. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- ↑ Potter, Brian E. (2018). "The Haines Index – it's time to revise it or replace it" (PDF). International Journal of Wildland Fire. 27 (7): 437–440. Bibcode:2018IJWF...27..437P. doi:10.1071/WF18015.
- ↑ "Service Change Notice 24-107: Discontinuation of Haines Index and Lightning Activity Level (LAL) as Fire Weather Forecast Elements in Fire Weather Products" (PDF). National Weather Service Headquarters. December 20, 2024. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- ↑ "Replacing Haines Index and Lightning Activity Level". National Wildfire Coordinating Group. February 6, 2026. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- ↑ "Flammagenitus". World Meteorological Organization, International Cloud Atlas. Retrieved August 7, 2026.
- 1 2 "Pyrocumulonimbus Clouds". Royal Meteorological Society. July 15, 2020. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- 1 2 Peterson, David A. (2022). "Understanding the critical elements of the pyrocumulonimbus storm sparked by high-intensity wildland fire". Communications Earth & Environment. 3 (1) 243. Bibcode:2022ComEE...3..243F. doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00566-8.
- 1 2 3 4 5 "What are pyrocumulonimbus clouds, and how are they intensifying France's wildfires?". ITV News. July 27, 2026. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- 1 2 Fromm, Michael; Lindsey, Daniel T.; Servranckx, René; Yue, Glenn; Trickl, Thomas; Sica, Robert; Doucet, Paul; Godin-Beekmann, Sophie (2010). "The Untold Story of Pyrocumulonimbus". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 91 (9): 1193–1210. Bibcode:2010BAMS...91.1193F. doi:10.1175/2010BAMS3004.1.
- 1 2 3 Mass, Clifford F.; Ovens, David (2021). "The Synoptic and Mesoscale Evolution Accompanying the 2018 Camp Fire of Northern California". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 102 (1): E168–E192. Bibcode:2021BAMS..102E.168M. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0124.1.
- ↑ Hoekstra, S.; Vickery, J.; Hatchett, B. J. (2026). "Igniting Insight: Evaluating NWS Red Flag Warnings within a Fire Partner Decision-Making Context". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 107 (4): E884–E901. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-25-0036.1.
- ↑ "Wildfires in the United States 101: Context and Consequences". Resources for the Future. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- 1 2 3 4 "1988 Fires". National Park Service. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- 1 2 "Historical Climate Data, Fort McMurray, May 2016". Environment and Climate Change Canada. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- ↑ "Fort McMurray wildfire costs to reach almost $9B, new report says". CBC News. January 17, 2017. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
- 1 2 3 "NOAA Satellites Monitor Raging Wildfires in California". NOAA/NESDIS. January 21, 2025. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
