Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Template talk:Christianity sidebar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Template talk:Christianity)
Latest comment: 18 days ago by Hapless.Winter.Striping in topic Why is Unitarianism under the "Restorationist" heading?

Adding Calvinism under Western Denominations

[edit]

I propose adding Calvinism under Denominations > Western > Protestant. GuardianH (talk) 08:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

It could be considered more of a theological tendency than a distinct group... AnonMoos (talk) 09:36, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
A theological tendency may mean that Calvinism could transcend certain religious boundaries, but I think that Calvinism is generally distinct from other Protestant branches (such as Lutheranism), and as such would probably best be placed as a separate branch. GuardianH (talk) 09:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Most of the new links added by helper are those concerning homosexuality. For example Christianity and homosexuality and the history of Christianity and homosexuality or LGBT clergy and gay bishop and Homosexual clergy in the Catholic Church and List of Christian denominational positions on homosexuality and The Bible and homosexuality and Queer theology and Christianity and transgender people. This is an overview template and so we don't need two related links for each topic. Otherwise the template will be bloated for no reason. I have tried to trim these links but was reverted. I have given my reason for reverting back here.

Also, terrorism is not a major topic associated with Christianity. I see no reason for its conclusion and will remove it as well. Durziil89 (talk) 15:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I agree with User:Durziil89 that the template should be basic in the sense that it should include major topics related to Christianity, (such as the Trinity, Prayer and Creeds). It should not focus on one topic alone, in keeping with the templates of other religious traditions, much like that of Judaism or Islam. That being said, I have restored the de facto denominational list that is a result of teamwork with User:Helper201 and me (with the addition of the Old Catholic Church). I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 15:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, we just need one link to Christian politics and readers can click on that link to find out more. The template doesn't need to list every single Christian political ideology that exists. Durziil89 (talk) 15:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 18 November 2025

[edit]

I propose that Gnosticism be added to the "Related Topics" tab. The Gnosticism template references early Christianity, so it is ideal for the inverse to be true as well. ~2025-34190-10 (talk) 14:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. Day Creature (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Changed color of cross

[edit]

The color for the cross was previously black, which is nowhere to be found in any offical capacity. Purple has been chosen as this represents "A sign of priestly calling, divine kingship, & royal identity, representing Christ as Mediator & King."[1] -- Gwillhickers (talk) 19:26, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

TheLionHasSeen -- Hello, was wondering why you changed the color of the Christian cross back to black. It was my concern that black was inappropriate -- made the symbol seem somber, per the reference I cited. The color used in the sidebar for Judaism is blue; the symbol for Islam is green; Hinduism is orange. Why are we using black for Christianity? -- Gwillhickers (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Agree that the color should not be a somber black, and purple is a good choice per Gwillhickers, maybe a deep purple would be better. Or, as an alternate, maybe a nice brown color which would symbolize an actual wooden cross. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:06, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
While there is no official color for all of Christianity, given all its denominations, no where is black used, except maybe in black and white text books, dictionaries and the like. After an extensive search it appears that purple, red and white are the most commonly used colors.
Given the meaning attributed to black, that should not be the color for a general symbol for Christianity in the sidebar-- Gwillhickers (talk) 16:42, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Gogerr, Aunger67 – Hello, an attempt was recently made by myself to change the color of the Christian cross in the side bar/template, but the change was reverted by another editor. As indicated above, using black as the color seems to give the cross a somber appearance. All the other major religions have sidebars that employ a pleasant color. On that note I suggested to use purple, or perhaps red, for the color, but given the last reversion it would seem appropriate to make the change with more than the current 2 to 1 (marginal) consensus. Your thoughts would be most welcomed. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 15:56, 17 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why is Unitarianism under the "Restorationist" heading?

[edit]

This is odd. It should, like Swedenborgianism, be under the Protestantism heading. Hapless.Winter.Striping (talk) 14:07, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

On this point, you are correct and I will fix the template accordingly. AnupamTalk 18:28, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Hapless.Winter.Striping (talk) 18:47, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply