Talk:Typeform (service)
Add topic(Redirected from Talk:Typeform.com)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by GeoffreyT2000 in topic Requested move 19 March 2018
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Typeform (service) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
Requested move 21 October 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus, redirect also not created per argument given below (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk) 17:27, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Typeform.com → Typeform – The service is commonly known as Typeform, no other article is occupying the page. Daylen (talk) 19:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)--Relisting. Armbrust The Homunculus 18:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - four distinct uses of "typeform" in Google Books, but the one found in Wikipedia article (see Long s, Nicolas Jenson) content [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=typeform+is&title=Special:Search&go=Go&searchToken=byofdiqqxudef0smb81oayd7t is the typographic typeform, as also in https://www.amazon.co.uk/Atlas-Typeforms-James-Sutton/dp/1853269115/ which happens to also be a reference work quoted in Wikipedia article footnotes: John Baskerville and Reverse-contrast typefaces and https://www.amazon.com/Typeforms-History-Alan-Bartram/dp/0712309713/ in article Sabon. That redlink should redirect to typeface. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- @In ictu oculi: Sorry if I seem a bit oblivious right now, but are you saying Typeform should be a disambiguation page or a redirect to Typeform.com? Steel1943 (talk) 22:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Steel1943: wasn't actually proposing anything for typeform, could be left as a redlink so the search engine will work more efficiently. If it is turned into anything a redirect to Typography would be the common meaning. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 19 March 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved to Typeform (service) per Feminist. The disambiguation page will then be moved to the base title. (closed by page mover) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Typeform.com → Typeform – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Wefk423 (talk) 08:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran(talk) 17:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). –Ammarpad (talk) 08:28, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose "Typeform" is too easily confused with letterform (see: Typeforms: A History (2007)). It should be made into a disambiguation page instead, IMO, or redirected to letterform.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- Move to Typeform (service) and create a disambiguation page at Typeform. "Typeform.com" is unsuitable as a page title as the company is rarely referred to by its domain name. feminist (talk) 18:34, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Typeform means typeform in printing. But since we don't have an article, just mentions, move Typeform (disambiguation) to baseline. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:54, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.