Talk:Polyandry in animals
Add topic(Redirected from Talk:Polyandry in nature)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Alpha3031 in topic Requested move 16 July 2023
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Polyandry in animals article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | Material from Polyandry was split out into Polyandry in nature on 20:04, 21 November 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Polyandry. |
Whales
[edit]The old refs for whales were expired. I've put in some new ones. Y-barton (talk) 06:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 16 July 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 04:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Polyandry in nature → Polyandry in animals – The article is explicitly about polyandry in non-human species, and nature is a broader term than animals. The article should be named similarly to the similar articles Polygyny in animals and Monogamy in animals. New9374 (talk) 23:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support per WP:CONSISTENT for consistency with similar article titles, and WP:PRECISE as "Nature" is way too vague for use in the title. Rreagan007 (talk) 02:56, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support. Consistent and precise per Rreagan007 and nom. ― Synpath 05:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.