Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Pet industry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Petconomy)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Steel1943 in topic Requested move 14 December 2019

Requested move 14 December 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 20:15, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


PetconomyPet industry – The proposed title is the common name of the topic. Petconomy is a neologism with no measurable usage in published books and only 7,100 exact-word Google results. In contrast, pet industry has some usage in published books and 975,000 exact-phrase Google results. Only one of the sources cited in the article, Inhapress, uses the term petconomy. If more reliable sources are found, we could include petconomy as a bolded alternative name in the first sentence. — Newslinger talk 19:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead and move it, sez me. When this article was created I was surprised to find that we did not have anything already in place providing the contents, and what I looked for, naturally, was "pet industry". It is a far more descriptive title. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:56, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
I wanted to give Dongil0324 and Epmdejong a chance to respond, since this article might be a student assignment according to the comments at User talk:Dongil0324 and User talk:Epmdejong. If there's overwhelming consensus to move the article, then feel free to close this discussion early. — Newslinger talk 20:04, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.