Talk:K. Visalini

Requested move 7 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Procedural page move. Article title moved back to K. Visalini. Thanks and kudos to nom for your input; everyone stay healthy! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 08:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

---

Kumarasamy Visalini → K. Visalini –I made a bad page move by accident, not knowing what a patronymic Indian name is like. aeschylus (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 3 June 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Revert undiscussed move and move back to K. Visalini. The results of #Requested move 7 January 2024 were reverted because the AfD was open at the time; that should no longer be a concern. (closed by non-admin page mover) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 13:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

---

Kumarasamy Visalini → K VisaliniK Visalini – Following Patronymic Indian name. I made bad move and can't reverse it. aeschylus (talk) 18:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

• Move to K. Visalini. Does appear to be her common name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Her IQ

There is no IQ Test, that nearly measures up to 225 with a standard deviation of 15, which is most common.You can't construct an IQ Tests, that measures that far, as you need a large enough sample size in that area, as IQ is a value of comparison, with others. Thus tests like Wechsler or Binet have a ceiling of 160 (SD 15). Looking at the gaussian distribution (IQ follows a gaussian distribution with a mean of 100) it's highly unlikely that someone had that IQ in the entirety of humanity. 2001:4DD0:3961:0:DDB6:E36F:5798:D792 (talk) 00:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

• You can take that up with the sources that cite it--or take issue with those sources. Otherwise it's really just a forum discussion. Drmies (talk) 01:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Her personal webpage closed

I substitute the latest capture, 3/30/25, from Internet Archive. When her page is restored, we should point to it again. Odd that she doesn't know or doesn't care that it's down. If some editor thinks she probably closed it intentionally, and that we should respect her reason, may revert. Cgmusselman (talk) 06:44, 15 November 2025 (UTC)