Talk:Invincible-class battlecruiser/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk) 11:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

• "although it must be said that the" - remove "it must be said that as it is redundant.

• Double check the use of HMS and SMS as it is currently inconsistently used. Also make sure that all ship names are properly italicised.
• There is a problematic convert template in the Battle of Jutland section.
• Link Admiral Horace Hood in the Jutland section.
• Put the last paragraph of Jutland into a sub-section of its own as it deals with the last five years of the battlecruiser's careers, not the battle itself.

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• "Gardiner and Gray" - I'd rather you named the publication, although it is not essential.

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

• Is it recorded how many casualties were casued by Inflexible's mine explosion?

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. I had a few other comments, but lost electricity at a vital moment and couldn't remember all that I had written. However, none of them was too important. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 11:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)