Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:IBM AS/400

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:IBM System i)
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Buran Biggest Fan in topic Frequency for IMPI

Convergence Section, previous name Consolidation

[edit]

Consider my edit: Convergence title makes more sense than Consolidation, evidenced by words in this section, somewhat modeled on article Technological convergence. EWLwiki (talk) 22:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Consider the way Linux articles are written

[edit]

I am impressed with the style shown in articles Linux kernel,History of Linux and Linux kernel version history I think the articles on IBM AS/400 and IBM i and IBM Power Systems could benefit by incorporating some of the style shown in the Linux articles. What say you? EWLwiki — Preceding undated comment added 22:26, 19 March 2022 (UTC) EWLwiki (talk) 22:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

CREATE PROGRAM instruction

[edit]

There should be a discussion of the role of the CREATE PROGRAM instruction, which compiles a TIMI template into a program object. I don't know about AS/400, but on S/38 that was the only way to create execurable code. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 16:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Architectural shift developed wholly internally"

[edit]

A citation was requested for "Although announced in 1988, the AS/400 remains IBM's most recent major architectural shift that was developed wholly internally." with the comment "...while POWER 7, 8, 9 and 10 were still developed in-house".

New Power processors aren't architectural shifts - they run newer versions of the Power ISA, but they don't support a completely new ISA.

But I'm not sure what the AS/400 is a shift from. Much of it is the same system architecture as System/38. The instruction set shift did switch from the developed-wholly-internally IMPI to the developed-internally (if you don't count Motorola and Apple's contributions to PowerPC) PowerAS (or whatever term refers to the AS/400-only extensions to PowerPC/Power ISA), but that wasn't part of the switch from System/38 to AS/400, that happened later in AS/400 history.

So the question remains - what does "architectural shift" mean here?

And, in any case, a citation is called for. Guy Harris (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Frequency for IMPI

[edit]

Hello,

I have seen the frequency for IMPI being stated as higher than 22MHz. However, My C10 is clocked at 5.43MHz. Maybe the clock frequency is multiplied internally?

Buran Biggest Fan (talk) 12:15, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply