Talk:Henley & Partners

Addition of 2 new lines along with references in the 'History' section

Hi, this is Sarah from H&P. I am proposing addition of new information along with references from news sources. Please add the two lines at the end of the third paragraph of the "History" section.

In November 2024, Nauru launched its citizenship by investment program, which is officially named the Nauru Economic and Climate Resilience Citizenship Program (NECRCP). The government of Nauru mandated Henley & Partners to design, set up and run the program, and act as an agent for the program.

For your convenience, the third paragraph of the "History" section would read as below after the placement of the requested line.

The company has advised the governments of Antigua and Barbuda, Grenada, and Cyprus on how to develop their own investment migration programs, and has since that time worked for and been mandated by several other governments. In 2012, Henley & Partners designed Antigua and Barbuda’s Citizenship-by-Investment Programme (CIP) under a government mandate. In 2017, the Government of Thailand appointed Henley & Partners to handle the international marketing of the country's residence program. In 2023, Namibia launched it's Residence by Investment program with Henley & Partners. The program, which is Africa's second investment migration program, requires investors seeking Namibian residency to make a real estate investment worth USD 316,000 at specific locations in the country. The program allows the right to live, do business and study in the country. In November 2024, Nauru launched its citizenship by investment program, which is officially named the Nauru Economic and Climate Resilience Citizenship Program (NECRCP). The government of Nauru mandated Henley & Partners to design, set up and run the program, and act as an agent for the program.

References

Thanks in advance! Sarah Nicklin (talk) 10:24, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Not done: The information is WP:COAT. In fact, the information already on the page about the program is overly detailed and should be reduced. Another editor may have a different opinion so feel free to ping anyone who has previously responded to any COI requests. CNMall41 (talk) 04:50, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

CNMall41, thanks for weighing in on my request. I will do as you suggested and ping someone who previously responded to my COI request.

Johannes Maximilian, I wanted to request you to review this edit request which is similar in nature to what you reviewed earlier. I have proposed addition of a few new lines along with references from news sources. Thanks in advance! Sarah Nicklin (talk) 06:45, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page. Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 05:35, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Johannes Maximilian, thanks for weighing in on my request. I will do as you suggested. Sarah Nicklin (talk) 07:24, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Please remove a line which is misleading and incorrect

Hi, this is Sarah from H&P. I am reporting a misleading information in a recently added line by an editor who has constantly been adding negative information about our company.

Please remove the last line at the end of the lead section. I am providing explanation for the same. I have marked the line in bold for your convenience in reviewing my request.

Reports produced by Henley have been criticized for errors related to methodology and data quality.

• Reason 1 - this line is false. Our reports have not been criticized for errors. Recently, just one think tank reviewed one of our reports and criticized it. That doesn't imply all our reports are criticized in general. This criticism was just an independent opinion of one think tank and the line added by the editor violates WP:OPINION.
• Reason 2 - the details about the criticism of that particular report is already added in the body of the article (recently too) - which we are not questioning. We are only asking for the line in lead section to be removed as it is misleading to the readers.
• Reason 3 - Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section states that the lead section should be a summary of the most important contents of the article. This line is clearly not the most important content of the article since its just an opinion of one think tank.
• Reason 4 - this line has not been added from a neutral point of view or in good faith. Instead, it has been added by an editor who has a continuous negative bias towards our company as you can review from all their previous edits on the page.

We believe that Wikipedia is a neutral platform and we trust that this line will be removed from the lead section. Thanks in advance!

Sarah Nicklin (talk) 09:13, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Not done: There are more sources to support the inclusion of that sentence, and I believe it does belong in the lead Likeanechointheforest (talk) 13:46, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi Likeanechointheforest, we respect your viewpoint, but if you are saying there are multiple sources for it, I would like to point out that having multiple source for an information does not imply it should be included in the lead section.

It is clearly stated in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section that the lead section should be a summary of the most important contents of the article.

We hope you do not disagree that this one criticism is not the most important content of the article?

We are asking for this line to be removed from the lead section. I trust you will honour our request. Sarah Nicklin (talk) 06:56, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

I would keep it in, personally! Likeanechointheforest (talk) 18:25, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi Likeanechointheforest, thanks for weighing in on my request. We appreciate you taking out the time to review it. Sarah Nicklin (talk) 07:36, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Removal of one line which is factually incorrect

Hi, this is Sarah from H&P.

Please remove the last line at the end of the lead section. Our reports are not criticized, in fact a few of our reports are considered industry benchmark reports. There is just one single report that recently received a criticism, which does not imply all our reports have been criticized. A one-off criticism should not be generalized this way and find its way into the lead section of the page. This is factually incorrect and very misleading to the readers.

The line to be removed is Reports produced by Henley, particularly those regarding wealth and wealth migration estimates, have been criticized for errors related to methodology and data quality.

I have marked it in bold for your convenience in reviewing my request.

Thanks in advance!

Sarah Nicklin (talk) 07:24, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Partly done: Sentence modified so that it doesn't imply all your reports are criticized anymore. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 13:01, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi @AlphaBetaGamma, thanks for weighing in on my request. We really appreciate you taking out the time to review it and correcting the misleading information.

Going by the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, we understand that the lead section should be a summary of the most important content of the article. The Wealth Migration Report is widely cited world-wide and has just received one-off criticism. This single criticism does not make it the most important content of the page by any means.

While we also understand that the lead section should state prominent controversies, this is just one single instance of criticism which can not be called a prominent controversy.

Bearing these points in mind, we are requesting you to remove this one line from the lead section - Wealth Migration Reports produced by Henley have been criticized for errors related to methodology and data quality.

Thanks in advance! Sarah Nicklin (talk) 09:12, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Need somebody else to weigh in. The lead should include summary about the Wealth Migration Report subsection, but most of the section talks about criticism of the report. The lead isn't really long enough to summarize the History section either, so that is a problem. I understand your frustration, but since Wikipedia's edits usually come from a random volunteer with differing interpretation of policies and not an editorial team with a concrete policy, not everyone knows all the solutions to a problem. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 09:33, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi @AlphaBetaGamma, we respect your viewpoint and appreciate you taking out the time to review it. Sarah Nicklin (talk) 08:53, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Addition of a new line along with references in the 'History' section

Hi, this is Sarah from H&P. I am proposing addition of a new line along with references from news sources. Please add the line below at the end of the third paragraph of the "History" section.

In July 2025, The Government of the Maldives contracted Henley & Partners to develop and implement the country’s first residence by investment program, and build an investor visa framework specifically linked to real estate acquisition.

For your convenience, the third paragraph of the "History" section would read as below after the placement of the requested line.

The company has advised the governments of Antigua and Barbuda, Grenada, and Cyprus on how to develop their own investment migration programs, and has since that time worked for and been mandated by several other governments. In 2012, Henley & Partners designed Antigua and Barbuda's Citizenship-by-Investment Programme (CIP) under a government mandate. In 2017, the Government of Thailand appointed Henley & Partners to handle the international marketing of the country's residence program. In 2023, Namibia launched its Residence by Investment program with Henley & Partners. The program, which is Africa's second investment migration program, requires investors seeking Namibian residency to make a real estate investment worth US$316,000 at specific locations in the country. The program allows the right to live, do business and study in the country. In November 2024, Nauru launched its citizenship by investment program, which is officially named the Nauru Economic and Climate Resilience Citizenship Program (NECRCP). The government of Nauru mandated Henley & Partners to design, set up and run the program, and act as an agent for the program. In July 2025, The Government of the Maldives contracted Henley & Partners to develop and implement the country’s first residence by investment program, and build an investor visa framework specifically linked to real estate acquisition.

References

Thanks in advance! Sarah Nicklin (talk) 08:46, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi, this is Sarah from H&P. I would like to request a review to our proposed information to be added. While we totally understand the review can take time, this is just a gentle follow up to our request. Thanks in advance!

@Johannes Maximilian, since you have reviewed our prior request which was similar in nature to this, I wanted to request you to review this new line. I have proposed addition of a new line along with references from news sources. Thanks in advance! Sarah Nicklin (talk) 06:18, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

I've implemented the request. You don't need four sources, so I kept the two that appear strongest (The Financial Express, Khaleej Times). Fiske (talk) 18:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Fiske, thanks for weighing in on my request. Also, I understand your point about keeping the two sources that appear strongest.Sarah Nicklin (talk) 07:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Updating key people

Hi, this is Sarah from H&P. Please update one person in the Key People of the Company infobox which is easily verifiable in media. My addition is in bold for your convenience.

Henley & Partners

Type	Private
Industry	Consultancy
Founded	1997 (1997)
Headquarters	London, UK
Number of locations	55 (2024)
Area served	Worldwide
Key people	Christian Kälin (Chairman and Partner) Juerg Steffen (CEO) Stefan Kraus (COO) Dominic Volek (Group Head of Private Clients) Philippe Amarante (Head of Government Advisory)
Services	Residence-by-investment, Citizenship-by-investment and Real estate advisory
Website	henleyglobal.com

References

Thanks in advance!Sarah Nicklin (talk) 08:04, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Reply 16-JUN-2026

  Edit request implemented    Spintendo  06:49, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Spintendo, thanks for weighing in on my request.Sarah Nicklin (talk) 07:48, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

1. Hi @Spintendo, I believe there is a small typo error. There is a missing round closing bracket in the infobox ) after Philippe Amarante (Head of Government Advisory

Could you please add the closing bracket, so it reads as Philippe Amarante (Head of Government Advisory)

Thanks once again for weighing in on my request.Sarah Nicklin (talk) 07:13, 27 June 2026 (UTC)