Talk:Constantine the Great/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Image:Torino-portapalatina01.jpg does not have a free license and must be removed, or the license issue resolved. In my rendering, there is a giant white space at the end of the section "Maxentius' rebellion"—this should be dealt with. Consider using the "upright" syntax on portrait-aligned images.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Fix the minor image problems and the article will pass by a farthing. Arsenikk ^(talk) 18:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

I believe I've addressed the image concerns. Is "[passing] by a farthing" a good or bad thing? It seems an awfully small denomination of coin to pass by. Geuiwogbil (Talk) 19:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Passed! To be quite honest, I mixed up a farthing and a league (don't ask why). So yes, it had a positive intention. As far as I can tell, this article is close to a featured quality, but I think the people down at FAC will claim it is a bit long. Consider using summary style on parts, such as "War against Maxentius", and others. Congratulations of an excellent piece of work. Arsenikk ^(talk) 19:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Geuiwogbil (Talk) 19:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)