Wikipedia talk:Contents/Types TOC

Icons

Nuvola:

P_icon:

(these 2 shared between sets):

Propose change of icons from Nuvola style to the P_icon style . P_ style is visually coherent and provides wikipedia a more professional look. Follow this link to see the proposed P_icon option, and leave a comment below . Elekhh (talk) 02:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

(I've added embedded examples for them all, at top, for easier glance comparison and discussion.)

I strongly agree that we need a more "professional" look, and I consider the Nuvola icons to be "cartoonish". However, I'd suggest that if we're just considering these 2 sets as the available options, then a mix of the two would be best - simply because the images used in some of the P_icons are ambiguous or non-obvious. Specifically, the Nuvola history icon seems clearer than the "man on horse" icon. Ideally, someone could find third/superior options for "art" and "history" and "reference". Those are my thoughts, at least. (And if updating, don't forget to update the other shared template: Portal:Contents/Types layout, at the same time.) -- Quiddity (talk) 20:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Agree that not all icons are perfectly suggestive of the topic, however overall P_icons are not less suggestive than the nuvola ones. Also important to note that in most or all cases these icons appear with text. I think the main decision is about the overall style. It is always possible to replace individual icons. Accordingly I suggest following alternative options for the history icon: (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) File:P rome colosseum 2.png, (e) . Elekhh (talk) 02:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Option (a) makes sense, as the most culture-neutral. -- Quiddity (talk) 03:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

I don't quite agree with that: symbols of past civilizations relate in similar way to present day cultures. On the other hand history is never culture-neutral. For graphic reasons I would prefer (e). Neverthless, as said before, I think the big step is changing the style altogether - individual icons can be improved afterwards. Elekhh (talk) 08:04, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

But b/c/d all represent "Western civilisation". Admittedly we are in the English Wikipedia, so it could make sense, but I would disagree. Option (e) seems more like a "culture" than "history" icon. Hence I'd recommend the hourglass. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Any suggestions for "Art" and "Reference" icons? -- Quiddity (talk) 03:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Alternatives for Art and culture: (a) , (b) ; however I'm happy with the Mona Lisa.

Alternatives for Reference: (a) , (b)  ;Elekhh (talk) 08:04, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

(a) for Reference. Any of the options for Art, (a/b/mona).

As noone else seems to be contributing, I'd say go for it and update away. Thanks for bringing it up :) -- Quiddity (talk) 18:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your constructive critique. I proceed than with the following set:

. I would also appreciate your help in updating any other pages which use these icons, in case I miss them. Elekhh (talk) 01:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Very nice. I like the new style. It looks a lot more professional. Thank you for being bold and implementing it! The Transhumanist 00:14, 12 January 2010 (UTC)