Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Vitrox92
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 08:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC) |
- Vitrox92 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- Arkanov15 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- Arkanov92 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- Kompul76 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- Rockyroad92 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- TreTaN21 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- Code letter: C.
- Supporting evidence: , , ,
Group of user accounts and IP addresses in the 125.164.x.x range has a history of creating hoax articles and adding hoax material to existing articles related to Indonesia, especially airports and airlines. Caniago (talk) 08:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Results
[edit]
Confirmed Vitrox92 == Arkanov15 == Arkanov92 == Kompul76 == Rockyroad92 == TreTaN21 (retag all as confirmed pointing to this case)- Confirmed above == the following as well (based on behaviour related to airports, tag or retag all as confirmed)
- Arkanov (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) (not currently blocked)
- SPuR10 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) (not currently blocked)
- SombroX9 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) (not currently blocked)
- Sotongman92 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) (already blocked and tagged as suspected Vitrox92 sock, can be moved to confirmed as with the rest)
- Pigdickinternational (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) (usernameblock, but should be retagged/additional tagged as sock)
- Victor N (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) (tagged as vandal but should be retagged)
Likely above == this additional one... it's very very likely, could call it confirmed if you want.
- CoastaLin39 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) ... tried hand at hoaxing stadiums, see AfD on Bali Wangi Stadium
- Regarding the IPs... I did not exhaustively check the IPs listed against the data (but have it saved, can if must)... spot checked half a dozen all match, no misses, so suggest that the IPs identified are indeed all matches. However, this is a wide IP range (125.164.128.0/18), belonging to an ISP and is used by others, including users and innocent IPs as well. I would advise against a range block at this time, unfortunately... the best that can be done is to keep blocking on behaviour and perhaps periodically do one of these checks to look for more new IDs not found (I found a few above). Subsequent CU: Please contact me for the log of my investigation.
Clerk note: could you check to see if there are previous cases this should be combined with?
Clerk assistance requested: there is a fair bit of tagging and retagging work needed as well, if you would be so kind.
That should do it I think. ++Lar: t/c 16:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- All tagged and indef-blocked. Keilanatalk(recall) 22:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.