Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Italways
Appearance
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
| request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 17:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC) |
- Italways (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- Zpearson (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) (confirmed sock)
- Rob farquharson (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) (confirmed sock)
- Italways22 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) (confirmed sock)
- Hugh shakespeare (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
- Code letter: F
- These users are making the same edits on the same articles as per the SSP here. Some of the socks have already been confirmed, but it wouldn't surprise me if this was an old vandal (see WP:LB) under a new name, given the focus on Masonic articles and themes, though the style is different enough to just be someone else. Italways' block log is here. MSJapan 17:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Addendum: Although the above accounts have now all been blocked, I'd like to see if the CU dredges up any sleepers. I can't imagine that someone who has gone to the trouble to make socks in the first place is simply going to stop after a few days. MSJapan 15:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
IP blocked; checked for new socks, but none found. Dmcdevit·t 02:22, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.