Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Haedn

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Haedn}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Haedn

• Haedn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Probbu (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Code letter: G
• Supporting evidence: Keeps vandalism User:Animum and User:Kurykh's talk and user pages with the {{humor}} tag.

This user is violating WP:SOCK and has vandalized these two user pages (as well as the other articles). This seems to happen every Saturday (in UTC).-Goodshoped 02:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: Both users are indef blocked. I assume User:Goodshoped35110s is willing to file a request for a hardblock on the IP. -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

• Mooroonic (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Dream YY (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)
• Uepsm (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI)

have also done the same thing. --- RockMFR 15:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, actually, I was hoping yeah. -Goodshoped 04:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

The request should be filed in the IP check section then, as Code A. Regardless, I've already taken a request about this and taken some measures to reduce the level of vandalism, though it was only feasable to reduce the vandalism, not eliminate it all together. Unnecessary --Deskana (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: notified submitter of this status. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.