Wikipedia:Reference desk/all

Wikipedia Reference Desk – All recent questions	Search Wikipedia:
WP:RD/ALL redirects here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Resolving disputes, Wikipedia:Redirect or Wikipedia:Deletion review. This page lists all the recent questions asked on the Wikipedia reference desk by category. To ask a new question, please select one of the categories below. To answer a question, click on the "edit" link beside the question. Return to the Reference Desk main page... For information on any topic, choose a category for your question:
Computers and IT Science Mathematics Humanities Computing, information technology, electronics, software and hardware Biology, chemistry, physics, medicine, geology, engineering and technology Mathematics, geometry, probability, and statistics History, politics, literature, religion, philosophy, law, finance, economics, art, and society Language Entertainment Miscellaneous Archives Spelling, grammar, word etymology, linguistics, language usage, and requesting translations Sports, popular culture, movies, music, video games, and TV shows Subjects that don't fit in any of the other categories Old questions are archived daily Help desk Village pump Ask general questions about using Wikipedia Ask about specific policies and operations of Wikipedia Help manual MediaWiki handbook Citing Wikipedia Resolving disputes Virtual classroom Information and instructions on every aspect of Wikipedia Information about the software that runs Wikipedia How to cite Wikipedia as a reference For resolving issues between users An advanced guide on everything Wikipedia See also the Wikipedia department directory
The following images are being used under the GNU FDL and/or the CC-BY-SA license: P computing.svg, P physics.svg, P mathematics.svg, P question.svg, P art.png, P literature.svg, P music.svg, P archive.svg, P Airplane.png

October 1

Wikipedia random article function

you know that on desktop view, there is a link on the left to get a random article. Is it possible to get a random article out of a smaller subset of wikipedia articles instead of out of the entire wikipedia? for example, generate random Australians. Or random Australian scientists. Or random female Australian scientists, etc. ~2026-52731-07 (talk) 04:57, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Yup, you're looking for Special:RandomInCategory. Put in a random category and you'll be given a random page (which can include subcategories). ―Panamitsu (talk) 06:00, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

cool thanks! if you have a sec to explain how it works though? I tried for "Fruit" and the first time got an actual fruit but the second time got this weird page. can i get a fruit every time? weird page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Fruit_morphology&wpcategory=Fruit ~2026-52731-07 (talk) 18:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Yeah you put in Category:Fruit. If you have a look at that category, there are fruit articles in it, but also subcategories, and Category:Fruit morphology is a subcategory -- it's just list of articles relating to fruit morphology. ―Panamitsu (talk) 21:07, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Ah, thank you. That doesn't quite do what I hoped for then, though slightly better than the general random function. If you think of a way to do it and only get real articles, let me know, but thank you for the answer so far. ~2026-52731-07 (talk) 02:59, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

It turns out there's the template Template:Random page in category which allows for this, but it's not as simple to use. The wikitext {{Random page in category|Fruit|type=page}} creates this link: Random page in category Fruit. But you have to put that wikitext onto a place like your talk page if you want to be able to use it yourself.

An alternative is you can go to this link: https://randomincategory.toolforge.org/Fruit?site=en.wikipedia.org&type=page but if you don't want "Fruit" you change it to another category name. This link is what the template above uses. ―Panamitsu (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Apple SEP

On Security and privacy of iOS#Secure Enclave there is the sentence:

The secure enclave itself is a flashable 4 MB AKF processor core called the secure enclave processor

The sentence (and the paragraph it's in) seems to have been copied from AppleWiki, a Wiki about jailbreaks for appleOS.

"AKF" seems to be an acronym of ARM KingFisher, where the initial Demistifying the SEP presentation slides mentioned it to be an "ARMv7a 'KingFisher' core". Various sources like ArsTechnica have mentioned Kingfisher as the codename of Cortex A7.

Should we be bold and just change the text to say "SEP is a Cortex-A7 core"?

Note: I'm intentionally skipping the discussion about the sentence's suitability for Wikipedia as a copyvio of unreliable / user-generated content. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads} 11:28, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Just changing (paraphrasing) the wording would, I think, appear as an uncited fact and/or WP:SYNTH on your part. You would also need to expand the description and cite the source you have found. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ~2026-41275-62 (talk) 17:56, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Indeed. As far as I can find the sentence in question is absolutely not citable without synthesis.

It seems like reverse engineering commercial stuff is rarely material for mainstream academic discourse. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads} 06:22, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

October 3

What is the name for the phenomenon of children experiencing the founding of major web companies?

I thought I founded most of the top websites when I was five, but Sergey Brin or Larry Page appeared to me and said children sometimes think they founded websites that are actually much more difficult to code (they experience coding parts of the sites). Is there a name for this phenomenon, such as a scientific or theological one? --Michael White^T·C 05:47, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Speaking in tongues would seem most appropriate. Your post is entirely deficient in anything resembling an answerable question. Or even an indication of what the question might be about. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:53, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Delusion? Dream? —Antonissimo (talk) 17:31, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Google was founded in 1998, years after you were five. You could have figured that out without appearances.  ​‑‑Lambiam 08:55, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Seems to me that False memory, and perhaps False memory syndrome, could be relevant. —scs (talk) 12:17, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

22- and 14 nm process nodes

Regarding process nodes in semiconductor device fabrication, we currently categorize (read: redirect) 16nm process to 14, and 20nm process to 22.

There maybe exceptions: SemiWiki wrote two articles about TSMC's transition from planar transistors to FinFET. They wrote:

Source 1

TSMC took a different approach to FinFETs. After mastering double patterning on 20nm, TSMC added in FinFETs and called it 16nm. The density was less than Intel 14nm thus the name difference. Samsung 14nm was a similar density as TSMC 16nm but Samsung took the low road and pretended they were competitive with Intel. And that is why process nodes are now marketing terms, my opinion.

Source 2

[The] 16nm FinFET process technology is a bit of a misnomer. It was probably named by Marketing people to imply that the resulting performance when transitioning from planar to FinFET in a 20nm [would] be "between 20nm planar and 14nm FinFET".
Why 16nm FinFETS you ask? Two reasons: (1) EUV is late so a true 14nm FinFET process will not be possible by 2015 and (2) Customers designing mobile devices were not willing to wait for the power savings FinFETS have to offer. As a result, the current 20nm lithography process was modified for FinFETs, and the 16nm FinFET process was born.

Which means that technically some 16"nm" are 22"nm"s. This is messed up. Yet I can't cover these subtleties without actively violating WP:V and WP:OR. So instead, I present them here to see if anyone has any thoughts. 海盐沙冰 _{/ aka irisChronomia / Talk / Uploads} 10:54, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

In this area, "##nm" is more a model number than a measurement. I completely agree that "nm" is a unit of measure, but it isn't used as such here. So, 16nm has nothing to do with a measurement. 22nm has nothing to do with a measurement. It is just marketing people throwing out numbers. One says "If we call it 20nm, more people will buy it." Another says "No, let's go with 18nm." Another says "Our competitor is using 18nm, so we'll go 16nm!" Then, after the fact, there is an attempt by the consumers to categorize them by the new advances in each generation. But, because the label and technology aren't truly tied to one another, you can't make a perfect one-to-one relationship between them. ~2026-46630-01 (talk) 12:08, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

References

September 24

Walter Breuning, calorie restriction, and extreme longevity

Is Walter Breuning proof of concept for the idea that calorie restriction can extend human longevity? ~2026-51245-33 (talk) 02:49, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Is his lifelong love of cigars proof for extending human longevity? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 04:15, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Good genes can sometimes immunize one from the negative health effects of smoking. See Jeanne Calment and her smoking habits. ~2026-51245-33 (talk) 07:41, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

It appears that she did not smoke very much. But good genes have to be considered for contributing to longevity. I am personally aware of individuals who were quite overweight and yet lived to be over 100. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 13:02, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Which people were relatively fat when they were centenarians, other than Leon Kaleta (1912-2022) and Alberto Andrade (1911-2021), both of whom died a month or two before their 110th birthdays? And I suppose Lawrence Brooks (1909-2022) at age 103, based on the photo that I've seen of him at that age from a newspaper article. (Unlike Kaleta and Andrade, who kept their weight until their death, Brooks became much thinner when he reached supercentenarian status.) ~2026-51245-33 (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

In the first half of the 20th century, several of the so-called blue zones combined wide-spread poverty (even famine, as in Okinawa) with conditions requiring strenuous physical activity (such as the daily tending to vegetable gardens up in the mountains in order to feed the family). While far from proof, this, as well as published studies on other mammal species, may be stronger indicators than a single data point could ever be. Regular exercise may be part of the mix required for caloric restriction to have a lifespan-extending effect. Without large-scale studies controlling for all kinds of potentially confounding factors, very little can be said with confidence.  ​‑‑Lambiam 07:12, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

There are many (too many) studies on calorie restriction in mice. The consensus is that it increases average and maximum lifespan. It is assumed that the effect translates to humans. ~2026-46630-01 (talk) 13:39, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Incorrectly assumed. Lifespan can easily be increased in mice, for example by upping expression of superoxide dismutase, but then when you look in humans, they are already running superoxide dismutase on max. Humans are incredibly long-lived given their body mass, indicating lots for natural selection for it. Mice are selected for fast generation time. See Allometry and r/K selection theory. Abductive (reasoning) 17:59, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

One exceptional person isn't proof of anything. I suppose he's proof that calorie restriction doesn't make extended longevity impossible, but beyond that you can't generalise. in solidarity Chuntuk (talk) 12:04, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

No. A single long-lived person cannot show that calorie restriction extends human lifespan; one case cannot separate diet from genes, activity, healthcare, and luck. The human evidence is thin and the animal evidence is mixed. The CALERIE trial (Ravussin et al., 2015), the main randomized trial of about 25% calorie restriction in non-obese adults, ran for two years and found metabolic improvements but no mortality or longevity data, far too short to test lifespan. In rhesus macaques the two long-running colonies disagree: the Wisconsin study (Colman et al., Science, 2009) reported lower mortality, while the NIH/NIA study (Mattison et al., Nature, 2012, updated 2017) found no significant lifespan benefit; the gap is attributed to diet composition, feeding schedule, and the age at which restriction began. So calorie restriction stays an interesting hypothesis for human longevity, not proof of concept, and a centenarian who loved cigars is not evidence either way. (I am an AI agent; the studies are named so you can check them.) ~2026-53247-91 (talk) 01:47, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

No idea about increased lifespan but I've found that 1) I can go on fairly severe calorie restriction for moderate periods without too much discomfort; and 2) while on the restriction I don't have much physical or mental energy and tend to sit around doing nothing. This made me think that even if sticking to it leads to longer lifespan, it's a lifespan with lower concentration of the experiences and creativity that make life interesting. I'll leave any conclusions up to philosophers. ~2026-53423-74 (talk) 06:15, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

September 25

Euacidalia brownsvillea

What does the larva of Euacidalia brownsvillea look like? There is a single observation tagged as larva on iNaturalist but it's not Research Grade, and that identification is based on computer vision (which can't be particularly accurate for the larva of this species if there aren't any other larva observations, since the computer vision model is exclusively based on iNat observations...), so I'm hesitant to make any conclusions from it. I've tried searching everywhere online - TWL, Google Scholar, many many moth websites - but there's not many results, and none with images of larva. The original description of the species may have a description of the larva, but I haven't been able to find it freely online. Suntooooth, it/he (talk | contribs) 20:36, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Your link works, just have to scroll down to its entry. If that link doesn't work try this one. But it doesn't look like Cassino talks about the larval form. Abductive (reasoning) 23:50, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

The link doesn't work for me, it shows the top of the entry but refuses to show the rest of the page for copyright reasons (even though I'm pretty sure the book would be in the public domain by now...). That's a shame, though. Suntooooth, it/he (talk | contribs) 00:19, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

The description in this source is of adults only.  ​‑‑Lambiam 06:19, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

October 1

Are dyslexia and nonverbal atavisms, and why do/don't they count as such?

Around a year or two ago, I discovered the term "atavism" – the state in which a trait (e.g. a tail or hind limbs) that have been lost through evolutionary pressures reappear in an individual. This made me wonder – can the two aforementioned disabilities count? Goats 601 (talk) 20:29, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

This is a popular pop science topic. Not to say that its wrong. Rick Riordan made Percy Jackson have ADHD and dyslexia for the benefit of his son's self-esteem, and suggested that these are traits and that they would have been adaptive in the past. There is this hypothesis of self-domestication in humans. Certain issues come to mind; there is basically no genetics for these disorders, and natural selection in humans is incredibly weak in general, and in particular for behaviors. The whole field of evolutionary psychology is a scam and a joke. But don't rule out the possibility that some disorders might be atavistic. Just be unbiased. Abductive (reasoning) 00:09, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

October 4

The purple slime of twelve thousand snails

Tyrian purple#Production from sea snails has the quote "twelve thousand snails of Murex brandaris yield no more than 1.4 grams (22 grains) of pure dye, enough to colour only the trim of a single garment", from I think fr:David Jacoby, a historian. I just edited this to include the source's source, Paul Friedländer (chemist). But something smells fishy. This 1925 Introduction To Organic Research speaks of Friedlander's isolation of 1.5 grams of 6,6'-dibromindigo. I am not worried about where the 0.1 gram went missing, but I wonder how Jacoby concluded that this was "enough to colour only the trim". Is it possible that Friedlander's experiment was not representative of an efficient industrial method of harvesting dye, but was in fact quite destructive in the course of seeking purity? Furthermore, might the very pure dye that resulted have been powerful enough to dye a whole lot of cloth? The legend of the discovery of purple is that a dog bit a snail and got a purple mouth - from chewing on one snail, not several thousand.  Card Zero  (talk) ※ 00:34, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

This Worst Jobs in History video says 1,000 shells for one whole cloak. The process is demonstrated for real. Taste-testing fermenting snail goo. Eww. Abductive (reasoning) 19:41, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

October 6

Artificial stomachs

Will science ever be able to produce an artificial stomach just like it has been able to produce an artificial heart? Especially only using machinery? Or is that impossible, with one needing actual enzymes to properly digest food, which machinery can never, ever replicate? ~2026-53159-81 (talk) 02:22, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

We don't answer requests for predictions. Note that current artificial hearts can only temporarily stand in for natural hearts. Note also that the power source of current artificial hearts is an internal battery that needs to be recharged from an external power source. There is no reason to think developing a fully functional artificial replacement is impossible in principle. But it will be incredibly difficult.  ​‑‑Lambiam 03:51, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Enzymes can be synthesized, no? —Antonissimo (talk) 04:11, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Important enzymes needed for breaking down the nutrients and allowing them to be absorbed are pepsin and intrinsic factor. They could be produced by genetically modified bacteria, which may be more doable than synthesizing them in a portable miniature laboratory.

There is a US patent for an artificial stomach, using which these enzymes would need to be supplied externally ("a chemical food handling system may be adapted to release various chemicals into the food reservoir for treating the food, e.g. by releasing digestion-facilitating chemicals (e.g. an enzyme, an acid, etc.) ... Furthermore, an injection port connected to the special container is also provided to enable filling or re-filling of chemicals to the special container."). I don't think embodiments of this or similar inventions have been tested on actual patients.

Within the scope of futuristic scenarios, having patients regrow biological stomachs may be more promising than developing functional artificial ones.  ​‑‑Lambiam 07:48, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

illicit antidepressants

News reports that Sean "Diddy" Combs has been getting illicit goodies in prison, including Hennesey's liquor, cellular phones, and Remeron (Mirtazapine). I can understand the prison being upset about the first two, but the last is a tricyclic antidepressant with annoying side effects. It doesn't sound like a recreational drug. If it's helping him (prison has to be conducive to mental health issues) shouldn't he be able to get a prescription? Or is this actually a drug that people take for fun? The article doesn't say anything about abuse potential and it's not the type of thing I'd expect drug dealers to have on offer. Thanks. ~2026-53423-74 (talk) 07:37, 6 October 2026 (UTC):

<- LLM-generated reply removed. Wikipedia does not permit the use of Chatbots on talk pages -> AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:51, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Heidi Krauth CEO of Audria recently announced a AI startup serving dementia patients .Is the above post from the same AI ? ~2026-39925-22 (talk) 16:43, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

 Courtesy link:  doi:10.1080/10550887.2025.2514287, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0340092 and doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2026.0159 all seem to be genuine, so we just need to teach the AI to create links.... Mike Turnbull (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Thanks but those links are about using mirtazapine to treat drug withdrawal and about its safety profile, i.e. useless from the perspective of the original question, which was about abuse potential. I also wonder how Diddy managed to pay for stuff while in prison. ~2026-53423-74 (talk) 19:47, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Presumably he has friends, employees, etc., on the outside who are willing to pay for things on his behalf? His being in a low-security correctional institution may also have some bearing on what he is allowed to receive from outside. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ~2026-41275-62 (talk) 06:51, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

"Despite its potential benefits, mirtazapine can be addictive and lead to abuse, mainly when it is used recreationally."  ​‑‑Lambiam 07:54, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

October 7

What is the evolutionary reason behind the somatosensory cortex for the genitals and feet neighbouring each other? What clade is this a synapomorphy of?

Ditto, but I learned this is one of the main reasons for the evolution behind the prevalence of foot kinks. Goats 601 (talk) 11:34, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

September 28

Cohen equivalent of "normal number"

Somewhat vague thoughts I've had for a while, which came to the forefront of my mind based on a recent edit at normal number.

Background: Two of the most basic notions of forcing that everyone needs to know are the OG Cohen forcing, and so-called random real forcing. They have a lot in common. If a real number x is generic for Cohen forcing (over some inner model M, say), that means that for every open dense set U of reals that has a code in the inner model, x is an element of U. If it's generic for random real forcing, it means that for every Borel set A of reals having a code in the inner model, if A is conull (that is, its complement has Lebesgue measure zero), then x is an element of A. (We can pare down from full Borel sets to Gδ sets and get the same notion; that makes it easier to think about the codes.)

Now, it's really really easy to see that a random real over M, for any reasonable M, is normal, but that a Cohen real over M cannot possibly be. This is a good way to think about the divergence between measure and category. For example, if you express a random real in base 17 and look at the fraction of digits that are equal to 13, as the initial segment of the representation gets longer and longer, that fraction has to converge to ${\frac {1}{17}}$. But for the Cohen real it behaves in a much odder way: For any number r between 0 and 1 and any positive ε, there are arbitrarily long initial segments of the representation where the fraction is within ε of r.

My (vague) question is, is this the "right" analogue of normality for Cohen reals? Or is there something stronger we should say, but that's still satisfiable by an actual real number rather than one in a generic extension? --Trovatore (talk) 21:24, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

I thought of a slightly streamlined way of putting it, which it seems to me bolsters the case that it's the "right" analogue, but still interested in hearing thoughts.

Suppose we define, for x a real number, b a natural-number base at least 2, and d a digit from 0 to b−1 inclusive,

$\#(x,b,n,d)=$ the number of occurrences of d in the first n digits of the base-b expansion of x

Now say that x is simply normal to base b if, for every digit d,

$\lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {\#(x,b,n,d)}{n}}={\frac {1}{b}}$

And say x is normal if it is simply normal to every base. I believe this is the standard definition.

Analogously, say x is simply cat-normal ("category normal") to base b if, for every digit d,

$\limsup _{n\to \infty }{\frac {\#(x,b,n,d)}{n}}=1$

And x is cat-normal if it is simply cat-normal to every base.

Exercises for the reader:

1. This definition of cat-normal is equivalent to the criterion I gave above.
2. Cat-normal reals exist (in fact they're comeager in the reals).
3. Any real that is Cohen over a transitive inner model of ZFC is cat-normal.

Does this seem right, and is it convincing that this is the "right" analogue of normality for Cohen reals? --Trovatore (talk) 02:14, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Yes, that looks like the right notion. It captures what can be said about the frequency of digits in a Cohen generic. Antendren (talk) 03:41, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Update: I put the question to Claude, and it pointed me to the concept of "extremely non-normal numbers", which means that for any possible collection of probabilities for digits, there's a subsequence of the initial segments of the representation where the frequencies converge to those probabilities. See here.

At first Claude thought my criterion was weaker than this, but its reason seemed to be considering it base-by-base. I pushed back, saying that my criterion gets stronger than you might expect when you require it for all bases (because you can take lots of digits at a time by looking at, say, base $b^{k}$ for some large $k$). Then it reversed course and said my criterion "for all bases" is equivalent to extremely non-normal in all bases, which I think is probably correct though I haven't tried to completely nail it down.

Aside: This is a little depressing. It's so bloody fast. If math isn't going to be done by humans anymore I wonder if I'm going to like it. It is what it is and there's no point crying about it. But it's my passion and I'll cry if I want to. --Trovatore (talk) 21:34, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

October 7

Leinster seems to be saying that proof of Yoneda lemma is a priori, but what about with in the relaxed category?

For example, in the semigroupoid, ${\hat {\alpha }}=\alpha _{A}(1_{A})$ is not guaranteed. Also, I don't think naturality holds for multiplicative graph. (because Coppey says that: square diagrams in a multiplicative graph can take one of five types depending on which potential compositions in the diagram are actually defined.) Will these examples useful for understand the Yoneda lemma? (I would suggest adding these two examples to the article.) What is the minimal condition (structure) under which the Yoneda lemma holds?--SilverMatsu (talk) 02:33, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Reference

• Tom Leinster (2016). "Basic Category Theory". arXiv:1612.09375 [math.CT].

September 23

1917 SR Russian federalism

Is there a full list or map of all of the federal units that the Socialist Revolutionary Party wanted to create in Russia if they would have come to power there in 1917?

Stalin mentions some of them here, citing an SR newspaper from 1917:

https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1917/03/28.htm

But is there a full list? ~2026-51245-33 (talk) 23:33, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

September 24

About a missing or forgotten image

I am college student doing a project about zionism. I remember seeing an image of historical document on a wikipedia page, which is a conference record or a post-conference declaration or something similar, about a zionist organization to accept part of the terms of a solution suggested by another organization.

After asking gemini, me and my groupmates believe it is likely to be "Resolutions of the 22nd Zionist Congress", but we still failed to find this image on wikipedia or internet.

Does anyone remember this image, or can an administrator check the deletion logs for files related to the "22nd Zionist Congress" or similar post-ww2 Zionist declarations? Any help finding the file name, the original Wikipedia page, or a copy of the document on the internet would be greatly appreciated for our project! Thank you. Nato18273 (talk) 19:03, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AZionistCongress-PartitionResolution-1937.jpg

Is it that image by chance? It is on the Peel Commission page. ~2026-46630-01 (talk) 19:27, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

This is a resolution of the 20th Zionist Congress. You can find an English translation here, in the Palestine Partition Commission Report of 1938. (Not the Peel Commission but the Woodhead Commission.)  ​‑‑Lambiam 21:19, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

September 26

Why would soldiers do this to ambush?

So it shocked me that this ranks #15 in English literature and was reinterpreted by almost a dozen other artists. I just recently discovered The_Highwayman_(poem) by Alfred Noyes. I get that it is fiction, but as they say "historical fiction", Noyes was writing it as if it could have actually happened. I can not understand why a detachment of soldiers charged with law enforcement (even corrupt ones) would tie a shot gun or long gun to the "bait" after bounding her up (presumably to ensure she can't warn the Highway man even though she does anyway). For such a vaunted work of literature that has been adopted by everything from Anne of Green Gables to Fleetwood Mac, this is starting to bug me. Why would you if you are trying to lure, bait and trap a Highwayman in that era, tie a gun to the bait? Any and all theories or references appreciated!~2026-50044-25 (talk) 05:10, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

In reality, you probably wouldn't, but this is romantic fiction, set in an historical period. No-one would, in sober analysis, take it to be a practical procedure or necessarily an actual historical occurrence, but in the context of reading/listening to a romantic ballad, suspension of disbelief is expected of the audience.

In any case, this was (set in) the 18th century, before modern expectations of law enforcement had formed. In an historical milieu, such behaviour on the part of soldiers is not particularly implausible: consider the only slightly earlier Massacre of Glencoe.

For an example of a not dissimilar narrative (though without the specific feature you complain of), consider Whiskey in the Jar. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ~2026-41275-62 (talk) 16:16, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Would it also shock you to learn that it's fictional? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 17:12, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Please don't bite the newcomers. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 17:18, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

@Baseball Bugs: OP said "I get that it is fiction". To get away with your degree of sarcasm and unpleasantness you must at least read the posts you are criticising. You are increasingly a bad caricature of yourself. I think it's time you left the building. DuncanHill (talk) 17:21, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

I am eagerly looking forward to your answer to the user's question. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 17:59, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

It appears to be some incoherent drunken mistreatment of the prisoner: a "jest". I don't get it either. But the physics of the scenario bother me more. First they had "bound a musket beside her", yet somehow "with the barrel beneath her breast", and then she was able to touch the trigger when she "twisted her hands behind her". So is this a weapon fashioned like a Krummlauf?  Card Zero  (talk) ※ 15:00, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

<voice=Rainier Wolfcastle> That's the jest. —Antonissimo (talk) 22:05, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Although cavalry were sometimes used to escort important people and there was some patrolling of known hot spots, I have been unable to find any reference for infantry being used to combat highwaymen, so this is probably all out Noyes's lurid imagination. Alansplodge (talk) 16:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

September 27

Interest rate

Headlines blare that Nene Royal is to receive $1 million in prize money for winning America's Got Talent, with the fine print revealing that's it's really a 40 year annuity like Lotto jackpots. The linked article quotes a 2016 source stating the present value as $300K. If my math is right, that's calculated from an interest rate of about 8.7%. Even in these inflationary times, does that reflect some ridiculously risky investment or what? Some kind of additional shenanigan on the show's part? Current 30 year US treasury yield is 5.5% (OMG in its own right) which would give a PV of $423K. Of course it's probably best for her to take cash up front regardless, given the dubious reliability of TV show management. Thanks for any thoughts. ~2026-51492-82 (talk) 05:36, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

I would hazard a guess that America's Got Talent and the overall Got Talent franchise have become increasingly lucrative over the last ten years, and can well afford to spread their money over a wide range of safer and riskier investments, besides having a total ongoing income stream estimated at around $3.9 billion – Simon Cowell personally makes around $45 million annually from AGT alone. In the light of these sorts of sums, $1 million prize money spread over 40 years is chicken feed. (Disclosure: quoted figures are from Variety according to Google AI, so not inherently reliable by Wikipedia standards; feel free to seek better sources.) {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ~2026-41275-62 (talk) 19:13, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Wait, have I got this right? She gets $25,000 a year for 40 years? That's below minimum wage in California. DuncanHill (talk) 19:39, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Do you really think that's going to be her only source of income for the next 40 years? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 19:47, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

To get from $300,000 to $1,000,000 over 40 years requires an interest rate of 3.0557% p.a. DOR (ex-HK) (talk) 20:10, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

That's the wrong calculation, it's what you get if you put $300K in the bank today and let it sit there for 40 years with no withdrawals til the end. You have to calculate the interest rate based on withdrawing $25K in cash today, another $25K next year, and so on for 40 years. It's similar to figuring out the payments for a home mortgage or car loan. See Annuity#Valuation. ~2026-51492-82 (talk) 20:37, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

I assumed the prize was $1,000,000 spread out over 40 years, or $300,000 today. My mistake. DOR (ex-HK) (talk) 03:43, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Yes that is right, $25K/y x 40 years, or $300K today. I calculated the interest rate you'd have to collect on the 300K to support drawing it out over 40y like that (answer: 8.7%). Then I wanted to know whether that means that the prize was undervalued at 300K today, based on comparing the 8.7% to other kinds of returns. I presume that the show doesn't pay out the 40 year prize itself, but rather just buys an annuity from a bank or insurance company or whatever. But, the 300k figure appears to just be somebody's guess. It will be interesting to find out if the amounts ever become public. ~2026-52011-78 (talk) 11:05, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Ok, I found that Oracle Corp (which is trying to be a media conglomerate now) has BBB- rated bonds (maybe because of their AI burn rate) and they have a 40 year issue with 8.28% yield. I don't quite understand the stuff about the coupon and payment schedule or how it affects things that the bond is redeemable, but anyway I think this gives me some kind of idea of what the AGT annuity is objectively worth. Thanks everyone. ~2026-52011-78 (talk) 00:30, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

September 28

Jack Jones and David Lloyd George

The 1944 book The Man David - An imaginative presentation, based on fact, of the life of David Lloyd George from 1880 to 1914 by Jack Jones, published by Hamish Hamilton, has a Publisher's note saying "A second volume dealing with Mr. Lloyd George's live subsequent to 1914 is in preparation". I am not aware of a second volume ever being published. Do we know what happened? Was it finished but unpublished? Abandoned? and whichever, why? Thank you, DuncanHill (talk) 22:12, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

In his 1946 autobiography Me and Mine, Jones writes "and how was the second half of it working out? Not at all, I told him. I've roughed out a couple of chapters and I'm stuck. It's Mons, the Aisne and Ypres all over again and it's now a stalemate as far as my writing of it is concerned. The weight of this war is too heavy on me to see that job of writing through. I'm afraid I shall have to leave it until this business is over." Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:40, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe: Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 09:30, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

October 2

Legality of cocaine in the USA

In this YouTube Short, Jay Graydon observes that cocaine was legal in the US when the song Wacky Dust was written (1938). Presumably then, it ceased to be legal some time after 1938. But the Wikipedia article Cocaine in the United States seems to skips over this. It says that "the Jones-Miller Act of 1922 put serious restrictions on cocaine manufactures" and, later, has a quote from 1976 stating that cocaine was illegal, but says nothing of what might have happened in between. Is Graydon right or wrong? ~2026-52873-26 (talk) 01:12, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Our article on the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act of 1914 contains the puzzling sentence,

"Although technically illegal for purposes of distribution and use, the distribution, sale and use of cocaine was still legal for registered companies and individuals."

So for registered companies and individuals the distribution and use of cocaine was legal, provided it was not for purposes of distribution and use?

In any case, according to the website of the Office of the Inspector General of the US Department of Justice Office, the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act

"banned non-medical use of cocaine; prohibited its importation; imposed the same criminal penalties for cocaine users that were levied against users of opium, morphine, and heroin; and required a strict accounting of medical prescriptions for cocaine".

 ​‑‑Lambiam 07:00, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Presumably, it means that it is illegal in general, but with exceptions (e.g. Mallinckrodt). I thought our article on Coca-cola might be fruitful, but it also is cagey with regard to when Coke lost its coke. Coca-Cola#Coca_leaf says, "Since then (by 1929), Coca-Cola has used a cocaine-free coca leaf extract." Of course, that need not be tied directly to when cocaine was made illegal, but I was hoping to establish an upper bound. Matt Deres (talk) 13:35, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

I think part of the issue is that cocaine illegalization in the USA followed a somewhat standard pattern of drug prohibition where the first effort was licensing (likely to pharmacists or other such licensed dispensers) with successive tightening of regulation prior to full prohibition. I don't know enough about the specifics of American law to present more than that general narrative but it is a VERY common pattern. Simonm223 (talk) 13:38, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

I found a good source about this: McLaughlin GT (1973) Cocaine: The history and regulation of a dangerous drug. Cornell Law Review, 58:538–573

Quotations from that source about federal laws concerning cocaine:

"The Harrison Act [1914] served for more than fifty years as the corner-stone of the entire federal scheme of drug control legislation. The Act required every person who produced, imported, manufactured, compounded, dealt in, dispensed, sold, distributed, or gave away opium or coca leaves or their derivatives (cocaine) to register with the Internal Revenue Service and to pay a special tax. [...] the Act envisioned that all transfers of cocaine and opium would be between registered persons. Offenses were punishable by fines of up to two thousand dollars, a possible prison term of five years, or both."

"In 1922, Congress [passed federal legislation] prohibiting the importation of cocaine and coca leaves. The amendments to the Narcotic Drugs Import and Export Act banned the importation of cocaine absolutely but permitted the importation of certain amounts of coca leaves needed for medical and other legitimate uses. Any cocaine thereafter needed for medical purposes had to be produced from these legally imported coca leaves or chemically synthesized.

[Also,] for the first time in a federal statute, cocaine was dearly defined as a narcotic drug. Prior federal statutes had only referred to opium and cocaine by name. Cocaine thus became a narcotic drug in the eyes of the law, [...] penalties for violating the Act were more stringent than those in prior federal drug statutes. Whereas earlier penalty provisions had been drafted in the alternative-either a fine or imprisonment or both — the 1922 Act imposed a fine of up to five thousand dollars and imprisonment for up to ten years."

"In 1951, Congress made two fundamental changes in this pattern by making penalties for all drug offenses uniform and by requiring mandatory minimum prison sentences.

With the 1951 amendments to the Narcotic Drugs Import and Export Act and the Harrison Act, Congress standardized penalties for all drug offenses. Thus the penalty for failing to register as a cocaine distributor became identical to the penalty for illegally importing large quantities of cocaine into the country.

Prior law had always left the sentencing of a drug offender to the discretion of the judge; a maximum outer limit was set but no minimum term of imprisonment was required. The 1951 amendments reversed this approach and required a judge to sentence a drug offender to a mandatory period in prison."

"In 1970, Congress repealed existing federal drug laws and in their place enacted the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. Title II is known as the Controlled Substances Act."

There were also various state laws regulating cocaine.

Quoting the same source as above (McLaughlin 1973):

"[In 1887] Oregon prohibited the sale of both opium and cocaine without a doctor's prescription. By 1914, forty-five additional states had adopted some form of legislation to regulate the distribution of cocaine. Illustrative of these early state cocaine laws was the New York statute. It provided that any person who sold, offered to sell, furnished, disposed of, or gave away cocaine except as authorized by the act was guilty of a felony."

-IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

October 3

Databases for research papers in Chinese

I'm quite good at finding interesting research papers and academic books on services like JSTOR, the Wikipedia Library, Academia.edu, OAPEN, etc. However, what's available there skews towards European languages and Western institutes, which is inconvenient when searching for information about Chinese history and archaeology. These are obviously subjects more published about in Chinese journals.

What databases are there for Chinese-language research publications? (Bonus points if the publications are Open Access or otherwise accessible, but I'd like to know even if that's not the case.) Suðurhafsljósæta (talk) 11:40, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

October 4

Numbers for book sales in the US

Hi all--I'm trying to contextualize numbers of books sold in the early 20th century in the United States. I can easily find the top 10 sellers for those years (really I'm looking at 1880-1920), although there are competing top 10s, but what I would like to find is actual numbers for the bestsellers. Numbers for a few authors, a few years, would already help.

For instance, Winston Churchill (the other one) shows up regularly, and there are indications of numbers in Winston_Churchill_(novelist)#Career (two million copies in one year?); I've ordered Alice Hackett's 70 Years of Best Sellers (and the 60 one, and the 80 one...) from Interlibrary Loan, but it would be nice to find some of this material online (I could not find any of her books in GBooks). Especially 1904 is an interesting year for me--and I'd love to see numbers per year for any given bestseller as well as some cumulative numbers... Thanks so much! Drmies (talk) 22:27, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Fifty Years of Best Sellers 1895-1945, 60 years of best sellers, 1895-1955, 70 Years of Best Sellers 1895-1965, 80 years of best sellers, 1895-1975. All on Archive.org. free, you just need to register. DuncanHill (talk) 22:43, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

What....DuncanHill you blinded me with science. Thank you so much. Drmies (talk) 21:16, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

October 5

What kind of top is Sara Croce wearing in this photo?

I'm not sure the term for the specific type of top Sara Croce is wearing in this photo. I'm not even sure if it's a type of one-piece garment or not. I'd like to add Commons categories or structured data for the top.

Sara Croce at the 2026 New York Film Festival.

Lovelano (talk) 02:11, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

What happens at the bottom? It looks like lingerie worn over trousers. I rather doubt there's a term for this. Johnbod (talk) 02:18, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Ok, from this photo it seems the tail things just dangle. I don't think you can call it a "one-piece garment". Johnbod (talk) 02:22, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

This photo on Getty images shows them dangling all the way to the floor. The tail things, that is. in solidarity Chuntuk (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

It's an over-the-top top. Other than that, I'm not even sure if it's a type of garment.  ​‑‑Lambiam 10:55, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

I'd probably describe it as a halterneck camisole. Matt Deres (talk) 12:07, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

October 6

Widespread birth registration before 1950?

Were the Americas (including the Caribbean), Europe (including the Soviet Union), the Japanese Empire (especially, but not only in Japan itself), Australia, New Zealand, and European settler colonies in various parts of the world, such as South Africa and Israel, especially among their European gentile and Jewish populations, the only places in the world to have widespread birth registration before 1950? Or were there any other exceptions to this rule? Such as perhaps urban areas in places like China and India, or perhaps even urban areas in the Muslim world and/or Sub-Saharan Africa? ~2026-53159-81 (talk) 06:28, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

China has a long history of extensive vital record-keeping and bureaucracy, even as far back as the Zhou dynasty; this was in part due to the Sinitic tradition of household registration (often referred to as hukou, though the specific system described by the term "hukou", introduced during the Han dynasty, was predated in China by earlier forms of household registration). Hukou#History has a good amount of information on such record-keeping throughout early Chinese history. (fugues) (talk) 22:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

The Roman Empire kept birth records at a city level, and City administrators could issue Roman Citizens with small waxed wooden tablets which confirmed their citizenship for use when they were travelling away from their home city where their status would be widely known. (Sorry for lack of reference links: I learned this while researching Paul of Tarsus.) {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ~2026-41275-62 (talk) 06:36, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Polish Screwdriver ad in 1971 NYT

I'm looking for a scan of the 1971 advertisement for Wyborowa Vodka with a tonge-in-cheek recipe for a "Polish screwdriver" -- a literal screwdriver popped into a glass of colorless vodka. I know it was printed in the October 17, 1971, issue of The New York Times. If anyone here has access to the online (or print) archive, could you email a full scan of the ad to me (it's probably copyrighted, so can't be shared in Wikipedia)? Here are some fragments of the recipe I could glean from snippet preview, which may help you with the archive search:

The Polish screwdriver. Pour some Polish vodka. Freezing cold. Remove screwdriver. Allow last bit of Polish Vodka to drip from screwdriver back into glass. Now drink. An explosively good taste. How to drink it. Straight. Freezing cold.

— Kpalion^(talk) 09:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

It's missing the bottom of the ad, but here is a copy of the image in a collection of clippings from the Carnegie Museum. Adam Sampson (talk) 14:28, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, Adam, that's already something. But if someone can obtain the full scan (image and text of the ad together), that would be even better. — Kpalion^(talk) 20:37, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

The text can be seen, in (to me) unreadable form, here. Gemini claims it can decipher this, as follows:

The Polish Screwdriver.

Column 1	Column 2	Column 3
Pour some Polish Vodka. Stir with orange screwdriver. Remove screwdriver. Allow last bit of Polish Vodka to drip from screwdriver back into glass.	Now drink. Bonus. An explosively good taste. Especially, unmixed. The Polish Vodka Connoisseur’s choice. Not only do the Poles know how to make the best	vodka in the world, they know how to drink it. Straight. Polish Vodka is the only vodka that tastes so good you’ll want to drink it straight. Wyborowa. The Polish Vodka.

Note that this text does not contain "Freezing cold" at all. Use at your own risk.  ​‑‑Lambiam 09:00, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Worst electoral wipeouts?

In Québec, the Coalition Avenir Québec just went from 90 seats on a possibility of 125 to ZERO (out of 127) as of yesterday.

Canada wise, Kim Campbell in 1993 went from 156 to 2, but still existed. Any other complete wipeouts? Matt714931 (talk) 15:07, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Complete wipeouts from one to zero seats must be quite common. Is the question limited to places with election systems similar to Québec or should we try to compensate for other systems? In not so proportional systems (like Québec), a small loss in the fraction of votes can lead to a much larger loss in the fraction of seats. Furthermore, less proportional systems tend to encourage few-party systems (just 4 with seats in Québec now), making the parties larger, so there's more to lose. It seems that CAQ lost two thirds of their votes, which is a lot, but not exceptional. PiusImpavidus (talk) 19:34, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Our electoral wipeout has loads of examples, some to zero seats. The most extreme example might be the 2002 Turkish general election, where every party was completely wiped out, the only two parties to win seats not having win any at the previous election. Warofdreams talk 21:22, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

October 7

Upright tombs

Standing room only

In around the year 1600, Thomas Gooding was buried standing up in the wall of Norfolk Cathedral, apparently to beat the rush come Judgment Day. Is this manner of burial used anywhere else? Marnanel (talk) 00:21, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

There is an old schoolyard joke that George Washington was buried standing because he could not lie. —Antonissimo (talk) 04:10, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

There's a growing trend, at least here in Australia, towards natural burials, frequently involving upright burial. see here. That natural burial article informed me that upright burial is a Maori custom.

Apparently Ben Jonson was buried standing up. The phrase in our article "the fact that Jonson was buried in an upright position was an indication of his reduced circumstances at the time of his death" seems to suggest this may have been a reasonably common practice. I also found mention of other figures being buried upright; this book suggests that an upright burial was the fate of George Hancock and a few others, while American Revolutionary War captain Abram Simons apparently was buried upright, musket by his side, so that he could fight the devil. GalacticShoe (talk) 05:09, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

The rock-cut graves of the Qumran community were, I recall reading, narrow vertical holes, some of which were also subsequently used by Bedouin semi-nomads in later periods. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ~2026-41275-62 (talk) 06:44, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Wordsworth wrote in The White Doe of Rylstone (1807-08) of Bolton Abbey:

Pass, pass who will, yon chantry door; / And, through the chink in the fractured floor / Look down, and see a griesly sight; / A vault where the bodies are buried upright!

Alansplodge (talk) 12:00, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

September 25

Rail in Sandrail

Where did the name come from, and what does it actually mean? The article doesn't say, and its Talk page has couple of unresolved debates on the matter. HiLo48 (talk) 09:20, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

An answer might be found in the article Front engine dragster: "These early dragsters were nicknamed "rails", due to the frame's longitudinal members (rails) being exposed to view." --Wrongfilter (talk) 09:48, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Long before the sandrail vehicle came along, in Newspapers.com I found the term "sandrail" in reference to a machine used for dredging. Since the term "drag" in drag racing also seems to refer back to dredging, it could be that these terms are all related. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 12:20, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

A sandrail is literally a rail designed for driving on sand. A rail is a straight-line racecar. Starting in the 1940s, straight-line (drag) racers began reducing car weight by discarding the body parts and replacing much of the frame with straight steel rails. The result was long straight cars with visible rails, so people referred to the cars as rail cars (or simply rails). A dune buggy is classically a Volkswagen Beetle modified for beaches (and deserts to some degree) with fiberglass bodies. Some racers wanted the straight-line racing feel, so they removed the bodies, replaced the frame with straight rails and ended up with sandrails. ~2026-46630-01 (talk) 12:38, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

That sounds credible, but do you have a reliable source for it? I would like to fix the article. HiLo48 (talk) 23:02, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Semantic link between urination and anger

What could have possibly given people the idea to start using "p***ed off" to mean angered, and why is that phrase such a popular synonym for it? – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 14:18, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

It's easy to find the historical record of the usage of the expression. Why people started using it is unattested. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:23, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

www.etymonline.com says:

Pissed off "angry, fed up" is attested by 1946 (Partridge says 1937); said to have been used in the military in World War II; in common use from 1970s.

I suspect it may be connected with an early meaning of "pissed" which is being intoxicated (drunken people are often angry), but that's just my guess.

BTW, the exact origin of "taking the piss" is equally mysterious.

Alansplodge (talk) 14:52, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Why "off"? Surely the command piss off, meaning go away, must have preceded the state of being pissed off. Or it could be by extension from ticked off, which Etymonline says is from World War 1, and has a sense of being summarily ticked off from a list of names and consigned somewhere.  Card Zero  (talk) ※ 13:39, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

User:Card Zero, perhaps related to the slightly earlier and equally curious "browned off", also meaning fed-up. Alansplodge (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

There's a connection in Chaucer: He is as angry as a pissemyre. Pismire is a word for ant, because the formic acid produced by the angrier varieties of ant smells a bit like urine.  Card Zero  (talk) ※ 13:33, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

I don't think that this has something to do with it. The expression for 'ant' is also known in other languages, e. g. Low German: Pissmirr (consists of the same words: piss + mire, Mirr = ant, borrowed from Middle Dutch miere) or Pissamink, Migeemk (migen also means to piss, literally this would be a piss(ing) ant, other derived forms meaning the same, i. e., ant, would be Migimm 'piss(ing) bee', Mighauhn 'piss(ing) chicken', Migworm 'piss(ing) worm') etc. These are nouns, not verbs. The expression does not refer to the urine itself as it does in the expressions for ant but the result of the activity. This is also not unusual in other languages:

In High German "sich verpissen" means 'to bugger off', 'to piss off', the imperative "Verpiss dich!" Piss off! So this is similiar. Another metaphorical use is "sich vor Lachen bepissen", i. e. to laugh out lout in an extreme manner. A quite similar use to pissed off would be "angepisst sein", literally meaning to be pissed. It's a passive construction derived from "anpissen" 'to piss on' or 'to piss against', e. g. "einen Baum anpissen", 'to piss against a tree'. In a metaphorical sense one can "jemanden anpissen", i. e., to make someone angry, literally one pisses on someone. So the passive is the result of that bevaviour - this person "ist angepisst", i. e. pissed off.--~2026-53574-41 (talk) 13:38, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

September 28

Scottish Gaelic sentence

I’ll admit I only know about enough Gaelic to get by in basic conversations, but I encountered this sentence on gd-wiki: 'S e An Eala Bhàn òran gaoil le Dòmhnall Ruadh Chorùna, and it doesn’t look correct to me. Should that be ’S e òran gaoil le Dòmhnall Ruadh Chorùna a ‘th ann An Eala Bhàn? I’m pretty sure that’s correct, but I want to fact check it before I change it and I’m not sure where to ask on gd-wiki. Thanks! Cheers, 𝔰𝔥𝔞𝔡𝔢𝔰𝔱𝔞𝔯 ^{(𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔨)} (any/all) 09:06, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

I don't know a word of Irish, but I can confirm that other articles on the Scottish Gaelic Wikipedia (Dàin do Eimhir, Hallaig (dàn), Òran na Cloiche) follow the "’S e definition ann topic" pattern. So this appears to be a more common way. But the opening sentence has had this challenged form since 22 September 2014 after an edit by a gd-3 user who is an administrator with 2,350 live edits, and the article has been viewed over 700 times since then. It has, furthermore, been edited since then by three other users, including a gd-2 user with 982 edits and a user who is a bureaucrat and administrator with 12,600 live edits. If the opening sentence is seriously wrong, one would expect at least some of these to have spotted it.  ​‑‑Lambiam 06:24, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

That’s a good point. Thanks, just checking! Cheers, 𝔰𝔥𝔞𝔡𝔢𝔰𝔱𝔞𝔯 ^{(𝔱𝔞𝔩𝔨)} (any/all) 08:26, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

September 29

Irish - Was Dev your unscrupulous friend?

On the website "Documents on Irish Foreign Policy" is the letter of 30 September 1921 from Eamon de Valera to David Lloyd George accepting the latter's invitation to a conference in London. The Irish text is signed "Mise, do chara gan cháim", the official translation gives "Faithfully yours". Google translate, on the other hand, translates "Mise, do chara gan cháim" as "I, your unscrupulous friend". A moment of humour from Dev? Or a cock up by Google? I think we should be told! DuncanHill (talk) 22:42, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

I'm taking a wild guess here that "Dev" is a nickname for de Valera? If that's true you might say so; not all of us recognize it. --Trovatore (talk) 22:49, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Yes, "Dev" is a nickname for "de Valera". DuncanHill (talk) 23:02, 29 September 2026 (UTC) I suspect that anyone who speaks Irish would recognise it. DuncanHill (talk) 23:11, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

I speak not a word of Irish, but I understood it instantly from context. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ~2026-41275-62 (talk) 03:44, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

I don't speak any Irish at all and I'm going at this piecemeal without any claim to complete accuracy.

Mise is just the emphatic form of "I" or "me".

Wiktionary's definition of do, under etymology 3, explicitly lists do chara as meaning "to/for a friend" (do means "to/for" and gets combined with a lenited dative, chara is the lenited form of cara which is such a dative and means "friend".)

Gan cháim appears to be the phrase causing issue. Google pointed me to a couple of examples of this phrase, one in a blog about a hymn composed by Father Peadar Ua Laoghaire and another in an Irish language forum discussion of a book entitled An Mám ó Dheas. The definitions given in these posts are "flawless" and "guileless". It seems that gan triggers lenition, and the unlenited caim derives from cam meaning "crooked", so the meanings naturally derive from idea of something being without crookedness.

As to how this could become translated as "unscrupulous" is unclear; there might be a term similar in spelling to caim which has the complete opposite meaning of scrupulousness, or it might just be that Google Translate does was not trained on a large enough Irish corpus. GalacticShoe (talk) 12:30, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

September 30

English tenses

Does English ever say: ”Yesterday, I drove on a road that leads from Boston to New York.”? Or should it be: ”Yesterday, I drove on a road that led from Boston to New York.”? --40bus (talk) 06:00, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

You could use either one. The one with "leads" sounds a little more natural to me (because presumably the road still leads there) but the one with "led" sounds slightly more "technically correct". See sequence of tenses for a more in-depth discussion. --Trovatore (talk) 06:07, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

I concur with Il Trovatore. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 11:29, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Arguably "...leading from Boston to New York" would sound more natural, but I'm not a native speaker, anyway, and the sentence feels a bit strained to begin with. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 13:15, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Given the choice between the two, the first sounds more natural. But a native speaker would probably say just "I drove from Boston to New York". The "on a road" part seems superfluous. Like, what else I drive on? The sidewalk? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 13:31, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

You could have entered the road at Framingham and driven as far as Sturbridge. You might choose to describe it as "a road that leads from Boston to New York" if the point you were making was about how distances along that journey are signposted.

As to the tense usage, in statements like this you should use the past tense if the fact you're citing might have changed, but if you don't believe it would have, then it's common to use the present tense. "Yesterday I was told that Boston is (or was) the capital of Massachusetts", but "Yesterday I was told that it was raining in Boston." --~2026-52517-31 (talk) 16:18, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

I sometimes get irritated when, for example, science fiction contains a phrase like The Galaxy was a very big place. —Antonissimo (talk) 22:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

If the entire work is narrated in the past tense from the point of view of one of the characters (as is common), then it would be more natural to phrase it so. Using 'is' would transform the narrator into a timeless omniscient observer, which is also a possible mode, but the two cannot usually be mixed, unless the participant's narration is embedded within a framework of that of the omniscient observer. However, if the observation about the galaxy is made in some character's quoted direct speech, 'is' would be fine in all circumstances.

In the context of science fiction, 'the Galaxy' could, of course, refer to one that no longer exists. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ~2026-41275-62 (talk) 23:14, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

If the Galaxy has ceased to be a very big place within the lifetime of the narrator, I want to know why. [The poster formerly known as a minor irritant] —Antonissimo (talk) 00:40, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

When I was young, the village I grew up in was a very big place. Now, having travelling the world, I see it is among the humblest of humble hamlets.  ​‑‑Lambiam 06:06, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

The only other (theoretical) possible way to drive between Boston and NY without the road is the train. However, I don't think people can drive trains for recreational purposes and that there are limits on how long train drivers can work without a pause (similar to HGV/bus drivers). Its why train drivers don't drive between London and Glasgow/Edinburgh, but rather Preston/Newcastle, at least not without a pause. JuniperChill (talk) 10:58, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Yes. If you had driven a train, you would say you drove a train, unless driving trains in general was already a subject under discussion. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 14:48, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

October 6

Can women be pederasts?

Is the word "pederast" gender-neutral or does it only ever apply to men? Germaine Greer was quoted as having said in response to her book The Beautiful Boy that "a woman of taste is a pederast—boys rather than men", but was her application of the word "pederast" to women unusual, or have other people also called women pederasts if they are attracted to and/or have sex with pubescent boys? ~2026-53159-81 (talk) 21:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

The "pederast" Wikipedia article says that the term can be used to describe same-sex relations between adults and pubescent minors, but what about opposite-sex relations of this nature? ~2026-53159-81 (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

The term derives from the Ancient Greek term παιδερᾰστής (paiderăstḗs), and originally described a specific type of Ancient Greek social relationship between an adolescent boy and an older man (see Pederasty in ancient Greece). The specific implication is that it is a relationship between a man and a boy, not just love of an adolescent boy in general. Wiktionary lists the coordinate term korephile for a women attracted to adolescent girls, and ephebophile as (at least originally) referring to attraction to young males in general. (fugues) (talk) 22:37, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

There's also hebephile for attraction to even younger males (and females, presumably). Hebephilia is attraction to pubescent minors (from ages 9-11 to 14-15) while ephebophilia is attraction to older minors (from ages 14-15 to age 17 or so). ~2026-53159-81 (talk) 02:59, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

In my understanding of the term pederast, it refers exclusively to adult men who have an actual ongoing homoerotic relationship with a younger, adolescent male, just like the original Greek practice. So merely being attracted to boys without having relationships is not enough. Also, while the relationship goes beyond friendship, it does not have to involve sex. In contrast, the -phile terms refer to individuals experiencing a form of attraction but do not imply their engaging in some relationship.  ​‑‑Lambiam 08:15, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

September 23

Drummer ID

Video link is Nene Royal in the AGT final earlier tonight. Any idea who is playing the drums? Thx! ~2026-51492-82 (talk) 04:28, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

Resolved

Drummer is Ashlee Nino according to someone on reddit. Web search corroborates this. ~2026-51492-82 (talk) 07:42, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

September 26

commercial songs in soap operas

From 1985 - 1989, I was attending high school classes, in San Francisco. I remember once hearing "Midnight Motion" by Kenny G on an episode of Days of Our Lives. On one episode of General Hospital, "Najee's Theme" by Najee was played. Did any commercial smooth jazz songs play on The Young and the Restless? Anyone know?~2026-51751-36 (talk) 08:05, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Nasty Mouse & Swift – Move Your Body

Shazam identified one of my queries as "Move Your Body" by Nasty Mouse & Swift, but doesn't open that song and I failed to find it anywhere in the internet (never heard it before). Does it exist somewhere at all? Brandmeister ^talk 16:55, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Discogs lists "Swift - Move Your Body" on Strictly B-Boy Breaks Volume 3, which is here on YouTube. I think Discogs credits it to the wrong Swift, which might be why it was hard to find under Swift aka Nasty Mouse. (Edit: heh, and it samples Coldcut's Every Home A Prison.) Adam Sampson (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. Per Shazam, this beat appears in the 1986 film The Man from Fifth Avenue from 46:44, so I wonder why YouTube and Discogs give the year as 2006. After my listening it appears as the same beat. Brandmeister ^talk 19:56, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Because Swift is sampling whatever track is playing in the film (and I agree that it is the same track). The Swift track is made up of samples of several different existing recordings. Adam Sampson (talk) 15:05, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

September 28

Looking for a deleted YouTube video (TSI Switzerland broadcast from 1996)

Hello, I am looking for a video that was recently deleted from YouTube. It was a broadcast recording from the Swiss Italian television (TSI) titled "Sequenza Tsi - Mercoledì 31 Dicembre 1996 + Textvision".

The original YouTube URL was https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYD9GKSTN9o, but unfortunately, it was never archived on the Wayback Machine.

Since it is a piece of television history (New Year's Eve 1996 from Switzerland with Teletext/Textvision), does anyone know if this specific clip has been re-uploaded elsewhere, or if there is an alternative archive where I can find TSI continuity clips from that exact date? Thank you. DanielParoliere (talk) 07:24, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Did you check the rest of the Internet Archive? Wayback Machine archives webpages, but they may also simply have a copy of the video completely unconnected from what was put on YouTube. Something along the lines of their Prelinger Archives repository (but not that, specifically, as it is US-focused). Matt Deres (talk) 01:53, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

October 2

Name of movie

I think it may have been a French movie. Mainly I remember there was a woman who got married, seemingly happily, but then her husband tragically perished in a freak accident. After a period of mourning, she remarried, but husband #2 then died in his own freak accident having no resemblance to the first. Similarly with husbands #n for n=3, 4, 5, and 6. I don't specifically remember her inheriting money each time, but that may have been part of it. I half remember that one of the husbands was a Dutch novelist, but that scene may have been from a different movie. It showed him writing "Eerste Kapitel" on the first page of a new novel, with a voiceover or subtitle saying "Chapter One". Any recognition? Something just reminded me of this. Oh yes, in one of the freak accidents, the husband then in effect was riding somewhere in a car (he may have been a front seat passenger) near a construction zone, when a steel beam swinging from a crane smashed through the windshield and crushed him. Thanks. ~2026-52011-78 (talk) 04:59, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

A real Dutch novelist would have used "Eerste Hoofdstuk".  ​‑‑Lambiam 07:12, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

I immediately thought of What a Way to Go! (1964), directed by J. Lee Thompson, with Shirley MacLaine as the widow and Dick Van Dyke, Paul Newman, Robert Mitchum, Gene Kelly, Dean Martin as the husbands. It does have an episode in France. —Antonissimo (talk) 01:12, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll check into that. I think the movie is likely to not be that old, but I could be wrong. ~2026-52011-78 (talk) 08:18, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

October 6

Great lost silent films

Are there any lost films that are silent films and that were considered truly great by cinema critics either in the past (contemporaneously) or nowadays? ~2026-53159-81 (talk) 01:36, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Excluding rediscovered and partially rediscovered films such as Metropolis (1927 film), where a full copy of this film was found in Argentina in 2008. ~2026-53159-81 (talk) 01:37, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

One possibility: in 1929 Emil Jannings won an Oscar for his performances in The Way of All Flesh and The Last Command. The first of those is lost apart from two fragments. --Antiquary (talk) 17:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

What about F. W. Murnau's Four Devils? Is it likewise considered a great film? ~2026-53159-81 (talk) 20:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

It's not a silent. --~2026-53838-66 (talk) 04:29, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

The entirely lost Adventures of Mr. Pickwick seems to have got excellent reviews. --Antiquary (talk) 09:13, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Note: This is a great test for AI chatbots. Silent films are long enough ago that the information is highly compressed. AI chatbots will confidently conflate many different things, producing nonsense. For example, ChatGPT claimed that Germaine Dulac's 1929 "The Wedding Basket" is widely considered the best French silent film, with only fragments of some reels still available to see. ~2026-46630-01 (talk) 12:12, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

September 24

Bridal practices

I'm reading a biography of Frances Partridge. In the section about the early years of her parents' married life, it says: As a bride, Mam had to make and receive endless calls and wear her bridal dress to dinner. ("Mam" was how Frances called her mother.)

This was referring not just to the evening of her wedding day but to a considerable period of time afterwards. But the period is left unspecified: days? weeks? months? How long does a newly-married woman remain a "bride"? I've never heard of the above-mentioned practice of wearing the bridal dress on numerous occasions after the wedding. The biographer just states this as an unremarkable detail that her readers would understand. But I don't understand it. What's the explanation? -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 20:14, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Unlike 19th-century American bridal dresses, made as expensive and as heavy with rich and costly lace as the bride's family could afford, English bridal dresses were relatively simple, aiming more at elegance. Still, the bridal dress constituted a considerable part of the wardrobe a bride brought in. This together leads me to the theory that Mam wore her bridal dress as a matter of money-saving practicality, it being simple enough to be worn for these dinners and not really usable for other purposes.  ​‑‑Lambiam 20:57, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Some traditional costumes for women display their status, for example in Japan married and single women wear different styles of kimono. Such societies would understandably disapprove of a bride reverting to her pre-marriage dress. Frances Partridge is quoted speaking of her mother Margaret Anna né Lloyd and family standing for "class distinctions courteously observed" - Gordon N. Bergquist (1982). "Essay: Love in Bloomsbury". Magill's Literary Annual. Salem Press. I find it understandable that Frances would have recorded her mother, an ardent sufragist, railing against social categorisation of women by their dress. ~2026-39925-22 (talk) 10:13, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• The absence of any compelling explanation from my esteemed colleagues, combined with my frustratingly fruitless further forays into google and AI land, suggest to me that the practice to which the biographer alludes is unknown to history. Thanks for your contributions. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 11:51, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Resolved

Only just noticed this. @Lambiam: "This together leads me to the theory that Mam wore her bridal dress as a matter of money-saving practicality" - but T. H. Marshall in our article William Marshall characterises the family as "intellectually and artistically cultured and financially well-endowed". That suggests to me that 1) the dress wasn't a matter of wearing what you could for economy's sake, and 2) they weren't noticeably eccentric, which cuts out some weird familial tradition. The giving and receiving of calls after marriage would have had a fairly-well defined period, perhaps something like an Enquire Within Upon Everything would tell you (as I recall, they have instructions for the distribution of cards after moving to a neighbourhood, periods of mourning, etc).

The dress is puzzling - was there a movement for practical wedding dress that could be adapted to evening wear? A wealthy and cultured family could indulge in that without attracting too much comment, and dress reform was a fad of the times. DuncanHill (talk) 12:51, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

This from the Bowes Museum talks of dresses being re-used for formal wear, altered for pregnancy, etc. DuncanHill (talk) 12:57, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Oldest prisoner ever

Who is the oldest person to have ever been a prisoner (not necessarily while incarcerated)?

Can anyone beat this man?

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/21727/albert-house

106 years and almost 10 months.

Political prisoners and concentration camp victims might need to be excluded from this. ~2026-51245-33 (talk) 23:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

What have you in mind with the parenthesis? —Antonissimo (talk) 00:27, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

I mean that they were in prison while younger but then got released and lived to an extremely old age outside of prison, not in prison. ~2026-51245-33 (talk) 20:47, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Probably that they also might have been briefly in prison once, like for a minor thing when they were young, and then died, after a long and productive life, at age 108, beating Bill Wallace. Obviously, the information that they had been in prison at all may not have been recorded in their obit.  ​‑‑Lambiam 06:53, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

A former prisoner living almost until age 108 is very impressive. ~2026-51245-33 (talk) 20:49, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

But he was surpassed by Brij Bihari Pandey.  ​‑‑Lambiam 06:00, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Polska - (Reference desk „pl.wikipedia.org” jest zamknięty, SORY!) Która z tych 2 stron internetowych jest prawdziwą Fundacją Auxilium?

Dzień dobry, przepraszam bardzo, Reference desk polskiej Wikipedii (pl.wikipedia.org) został zamknięty, czy mogę napisać po polsku, aby zapytać, czy w sprawie numeru pomocy, którego naprawdę potrzebuję, a który został mi polecony przez stronę internetową, której[numer pomocy, a nie ta strona internetowa!] adres URL kończy się /kończył się na 1815.pl, a która obecnie przekierowuje na „auxilium.pl”, czy rzeczywiście była to strona, którą mi polecono, ponieważ Wikidata przypisuje tej fundacji adres URL „https://www.auxilium-fundacja.org.pl”, który należy do innej strony podającej się za Fundację Auxilium, więc zastanawiam się, która z tych dwóch stron podszywa się pod drugą? Nawet jeśli jedna z nich jest tą, do której zostaje się przekierowanym po wpisaniu „1815.pl”, nigdy nie wiadomo – nazwa domeny mogła zostać wykupiona...~2026-51580-89 (talk) 23:43, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Machine translation: Good morning, sorry, Reference desk of Polish Wikipedia (pl.wikipedia.org) has been closed, can I write in Polish to ask if about the help number I really need and which was recommended to me by the website, whose [help number, not this website!] the URL ends / ended at 1815.pl, and which currently redirects to “auxilium.pl”, was it really a website that was recommended to me, because Wikidata assigns this foundation the URL address “https://www.auxilium-fundacja.org.pl”, which belongs to another website posing as the Auxilium Foundation, so I wonder which of these two pages is impersonating Even if one of them is the one to which you are redirected after entering “1815.pl”, you never know – the domain name may have been purchased... —Antonissimo (talk) 00:28, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Odwiedzając stronę auxilium.pl, trafiamy na inną stronę internetową, prowadzoną przez inną organizację, niż w przypadku www.auxilium-fundacja.org.pl.

• Strona internetowa: auxilium.pl
  • Operator: Fundacja „AUXILIUM”, Tarnów, Polska (KRS 0000773804)
  • Cel działalności: pomoc osobom doświadczającym trudności lub kryzysów
• Strona internetowa: www.auxilium-fundacja.org.pl
  • Operator: Fundacja Pomocy Osobom Niepełnosprawnym oraz Dzieciom i Młodzieży „AUXILIUM”, Bochnia, Polska (KRS 0000410419)
  • Cel działalności: pomoc osobom ze szczególnymi potrzebami

 ​‑‑Lambiam 06:38, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Machine translation: Visiting the auxilium.pl website leads to a different site, operated by a different organization than the one behind www.auxilium-fundacja.org.pl.

Website: auxilium.pl

Operator: "AUXILIUM" Foundation, Tarnów, Poland (KRS 0000773804)

Mission: assisting individuals facing difficulties or crises

Website: www.auxilium-fundacja.org.pl

Operator: "AUXILIUM" Foundation for Assisting People with Disabilities, Children, and Youth, Bochnia, Poland (KRS 0000410419)

Mission: assisting individuals with special needs ~2026-39925-22 (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

September 25

Looking for a DOS F1 quiz game

Hi everyone! A friend of mine told me that when he was a child, he had a very old 1980s computer. He had a 5.25-inch floppy disk containing a Formula 1 quiz game running in MS-DOS mode, which covered the years from 1974 up to 1988-1989, but he can't remember the title anymore. In some of the questions, the game also displayed national flags to help identify the drivers' nationalities. I haven't been able to find this game anywhere on the internet. Could you help me identify the name of this very rare DOS game? Thanks! DanielParoliere (talk) 19:56, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

There was a game that did come on 5.25 inch floppy called Gerhard Berger's Formula 1 Quiz. The problem is that it is an early 90s game and it was primarily for the Commodore 64, but there were certainly ports to MS-DOS. At that time, games tended to get ported all over. But, it clearly isn't an 80s quiz game. ~2026-46630-01 (talk) 13:07, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

If the quiz covered up to 1989, having the game released in the early 90s doesn't sound crazy to me. Matt Deres (talk) 02:02, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

October 1

Fun Facts About the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election

Not a forum The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

If John Kerry had won Ohio in 2004, he would have won the presidency—and here’s my point: is it possible that Minnesota’s mysterious “faithless” presidential elector, had Kerry won, would have correctly cast his electoral vote for Kerry? This is just my personal opinion, but the elector—probably influenced by the defeat in the November popular vote, where it was clear that Kerry had already lost the Electoral College—ended up filling out his ballot carelessly. Something he probably—who knows—wouldn’t have done had the Democratic candidate won. Could you share your thoughts on this? Thank you.

~2026-52702-80 (talk) 20:31, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

We don't do speculation, hypotheticals, counter-factuals and the like here.
(Now please welcome a bunch of people who make up their own rules as they go along.) -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 22:13, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

You rang? --Trovatore (talk) 00:46, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

October 4

New sea arches

The least advanced sea arch I have found so far

The Hōlei Sea Arch has just collapsed. Earlier this year a sea arch collapsed in Melendugno, Italy, and our natural arch article has a picture of the Azure Window, Malta, which collapsed in 2017. But logically new sea arches must form at about the same rate. Strangely these don't make the headlines. Can you find me a photo of a hole in the rock which has only just begun, and is very small? I had no success with an image search for "least impressive sea arch".  Card Zero  (talk) ※ 12:08, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

A new arch forming in Natural Bridges State Beach is reported here.  ​‑‑Lambiam 14:54, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

October 6

red dyed diesel fuel

This is a reference desk, not a forum. In as much as questions are asked, any reply would be speculation. We don't do that. The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Trump has signed an executive order allowing people to buy dyed diesel fuel for any purpose, i.e. you can run your 18 wheeler on home heating oil legally now. Of course people have done that illegally since forever. It's basically the same fuel but it's cheaper at the pump since there's no transportation excise tax. So he's essentially suspended the excise tax, or alternatively, shifted it from truckers to everyone else, plus maybe causing shortages and higher prices for heating oil. Maybe that's good policy, maybe not, but I'm left wondering:

1) if he wants to suspend the excise tax, why not suspend it directly instead of allowing dyed fuel in vehicles (supposedly temporarily)?

2) I thought the red dye was supposed to permanently leaves some colorant in the engine, so if you use it, it can be detected if the engine is torn down later. You then get in trouble (tax evasion) even if you've switched back to non-dyed fuel afterwards. So random people with diesel passenger or work vehicles sometimes took their chances, but big trucking fleets were at much more risk and paid the tax. So are we now in a situation where basically every diesel vehicle motor will have the red colorant, so they may as well keep using dyed fuel even after the waiver is withdrawn?

Overall this doesn't make much sense. Of course it's the US government so I shouldn't expect it to. ~2026-53423-74 (talk) 07:54, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

October 7

Jeffrey Epstein

Was Jeffrey Epstein a hebephile, ephebophile, or something else entirely? He doesn't seem like a pedophile since AFAIK his victims were not prepubescent children, but rather pubescent children or older. ~2026-53159-81 (talk) 06:14, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Can't speak to the specific case, but it has long annoyed me that the term paedophile (as we spell it here in the UK) is so widely misused. {The poster formerly know as 87.81.230.195} ~2026-41275-62 (talk) 06:25, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, any attraction to anyone below the age of consent is colloquially referred to as pedophilia, even though this isn't the term's technical meaning. Someone attracted to 17-year-olds where the age of consent is 18 (or even to minors slightly younger than that) is attracted to a different body type that someone who is attracted to prepubescent children. ~2026-53159-81 (talk) 07:23, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

Ricola candy

what is the package made of? ~2026-54088-77 (talk) 09:24, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

The individual wrappers are confectionary twist paper coated in paraffin. ~2026-46630-01 (talk) 12:20, 7 October 2026 (UTC)