Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Laurie Dutcher
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
This entry has been deleted twice for promotionalism and lack of sourcing, and my own searches did not turn up sourcing that would sustain a new draft. As it's been submitted repeatedly (twice just today on this draft, twice previously), salting may be warranted. Innisfree987 (talk) 17:52, 6 March 2017 (UTC) Innisfree987 (talk) 17:52, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete and salt - This edit by the article creator today at the Teahouse strongly indicates this a paid creation (describing this draft as "our" article). My searches have turned up nothing on it. John from Idegon (talk) 05:10, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurie Dutcher. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete and salt per John from Idegon. Same instance occured at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. JTP (talk • contribs) 18:12, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.